Should Teens Be Tried As Adults This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine.

   Should teenagers be tried as adults? Opinions differ. Some people argue that teenagers don't know what they are doing when they commit a crime and are still too young to comprehend what is right and wrong. I totally disagree. I am old enough to know that committing a crime is wrong and that if I commit one, I will be punished. Anyone who says teens can't tell right from wrong is either too old to remember what being a teenager is like or they are a teenager who has committed a crime and don't want to be tried as an adult. In either case, they are wrong. All teens know that killing is wrong, yet they do it anyway and get away with a light sentence because of their age. Even if a teen didn't know it was wrong, it doesn't mean it's right. They should still be punished. If they aren't, they willthink that crimes are okay and continue to commit them.

Teens today don't fear the law because they don't think they will get caught. And if they do, they know they have a good chance of getting off because they are tried as teens and not adults. We have to get tougher on crime. There should be a law that everyone over eleven years old will be tried as adults. That way more teens would be discouraged from committing crimes. They would know that murder would get them a very long sentence instead of staying in juvenile hall until they are eighteen. If we want to cut down on teen crime, we have to have tougher laws. ?

This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. This piece has been published in Teen Ink’s monthly print magazine.

Join the Discussion

This article has 324 comments. Post your own now!

violenttiger said...
May 17, 2011 at 12:07 pm
Children should not be tried as an adult, just because one person knows right from wrong doesn't mean that everyone does, some people have different backrounds.. Maybe they wern't taught. I don't think any kid below twelve should be tried! they dont know what they are doing, and don't know coniquences! Even teens don't always make mature honest desicions... THINK ABOUT IT
nessarobin replied...
Jul. 6, 2011 at 12:04 pm
to new it doesnt make it right or okay that the kid did the crime but then again we are not the judge and we do not know what is goin on in other peoples minds...some people have mental issues
RainyWriter This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. said...
May 10, 2011 at 7:00 pm

I'm thinking 11 is a little young, maybe 14 or 15.

We're always wanting to be treated like adults, I only think it's fair that if a crime that is so horrendous adults have difficulty dealing with it, should be trialed (is that a word?) like an adult case would. Now there's all that stuff about prefrontal cortex or whatnot in a young person's brain, but if a person is intelligent enought to kill someone and try to cover it up, it's not a matter of brain capacity or reasoning, it'... (more »)

K.M.S.Shear replied...
Jun. 1, 2011 at 7:53 am
i agree with you i know whats right and wrong and still am in my younger teens. I see how inmuture people my age can be. So teens under the age of fifteen should begiven a breack.  
------ said...
May 9, 2011 at 6:22 pm
I'm 17 and havent committed any crime and I don't believe minors should be tried as adults. Hole in your arguement?
Gigantron replied...
May 10, 2011 at 6:58 pm
There is absolutely no way you can provide a solid argument with purely anecdotal experience. Your comment thusly is rendered invalid. 
RJ Unicruz said...
Apr. 29, 2011 at 1:31 pm
Well, as far as I know, teenagers are still classified as premature humans. Although they have the knowledge that committing a crime is a bad thing, they still do it and I agree that they should be punished. But the main question is this: Do we forgive enough? Of course, the answer is a vague "no". Though some people can forgive others, teens are hard to forgive because of there culpability as premature humans, which leads to big questions to how much the punishment would be. For me, the questio... (more »)
i<3soda said...
Apr. 27, 2011 at 7:48 pm
Well most of teens that do commite murder aren't in the right state of mind when it happens and have been said to have mental issues.
none said...
Apr. 22, 2011 at 10:34 am
In 1993, 2-year-old Jamie Bulger living in Bootle, England, was taken by two 10-year-old boys and was mutilated and murdered.  The two boys then laid his body on a railroad track with the intention of causing substantial injury which would cover up what they had done to the child.  The murderers were tried and convicted as minors and the boys have since been relocated and given new identities. okay so now tell me the an 11 year old wouldnt kill someone? cause im pretty sure that they a... (more »)
Tohruhonda105 said...
Apr. 20, 2011 at 9:05 am
If you agreee with this comment plz comment...GUMMY BEARS AND M&M'S WILL RULE THE WORLD!!!!
Tohruhonda105 replied...
Apr. 20, 2011 at 9:06 am
lml (>.<) lml
Archangel1410 said...
Apr. 18, 2011 at 8:33 pm
I agree and disagree. I agree that teens do think they can get away with most crimes just because they are underage. However being 18 and above in american shows you are an adult. Teens shouldnt be tried as adults because they arent adults. Sometimes people dont know what they are doing. Now what were you thinking when you said eleven and above. I can hardly see and eleven year old in Middle School killing someone. the age should be more like 16 or 15. Not 11 thats stupid. Sorry but thats tooooo... (more »)
Tohruhonda105 replied...
Apr. 20, 2011 at 9:04 am
Blobthe15 said...
Apr. 18, 2011 at 5:51 pm

Maybe, but children should only be tried for adults until they have all the freedoms an adult has. We have to go to school against our will, we have to eat foods we don't like, we have to wear clothes that we don't want to, the list goes on and on. Once teens are granted those freedoms, I think they can't be held accountable for adult crimes and punishement.

Unless they're like 4, but I don't know how a 4 year old could kill someone.

Tohruhonda105 replied...
Apr. 20, 2011 at 9:07 am
No....there is no maby T_T
Fudged Up replied...
May 23, 2011 at 1:10 pm
YES! Because its SOOOO bad to get an education, get a nutrious meal, and even HAVE CLOTHES!! You want freedom? Move out and get a job. Ou want freedom, youre gonna get responsibilities too.
scamp24 said...
Apr. 18, 2011 at 1:00 pm
I agree that teens should be tried as adults. But, only for major crimes, like murder. But, if a teen steals something(like a keychain) from a store,they should be tried as teens.But if a teen stole something bigger,the punuishment should be more severe.
WritingAngel20 said...
Apr. 18, 2011 at 12:09 pm
I believe that if you kill somebody, uh, you should go to jail, and keep in mind, while age may be a contributing factor, the severity of the crime is a factor as well, the youngest age to be tried as an adult where I'm at is twelve and trust me, you don't want a twelve year old walking the streets after they just committed murder, for real. Also a ten year old choked a little boy (Mary Bell, you may know her) and was put in a detention center but was retried because of her age and has a kid and... (more »)
Tohruhond105 replied...
Apr. 20, 2011 at 9:09 am
...writingangle...rly? WHO COMES UP WITH ORIGANAL NAMES LIKE THT!!!! :DD -hi5-
Victoria B. This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. said...
Apr. 18, 2011 at 12:13 am
I believe the point of teens being tried easier is a matter of how a teen's mind works. While teens have an idea of right and wrong and are fully capable of distinguishing the two, they may not always realize the extent to their actions. They know a crime is bad, but do they understand why? Do they comprehend the full  responsibilities to their actions? Possibly, but why should every teen, regardless of intelegence or ability, be shackled to being tried as an adult when they did not fully u... (more »)
iLove Teens said...
Apr. 15, 2011 at 8:52 am
teens are not stupid you are if you say that
Site Feedback