Teens Should Absolutely Be Tried as Adults When They Commit Adult Crimes | Teen Ink

Teens Should Absolutely Be Tried as Adults When They Commit Adult Crimes

January 11, 2010
By hchs1259 SILVER, Houston, Texas
hchs1259 SILVER, Houston, Texas
5 articles 0 photos 0 comments

Murderers, rapists, and other criminals are being released from jail everyday after serving only very short and lenient sentences. Who are these criminals and what makes them so special? The criminals are juveniles who commit adult crimes. They are being tried every day in juvenile courts, they are receiving shortened sentences, and they are being released and given new identities to continue to live their lives in peaceful and happy bliss, all while their victims and their families are left to suffer forever. Because the courts and juvenile rights advocates believe that second chances should be given to youths who commit crimes, criminals are walking the streets, living as our neighbors, and in many instances committing additional crimes.

When it comes to trying teens in court as adults. Some say stop trying them as adults and try them as juveniles, others say they must be tried as adults when they commit adult crimes. I believe that teens should be held accountable for their actions and tried as adults. If I knew somebody who hurt or killed someone I loved, I would want him or her to experience the worst possible punishment for his or her actions. Some people say that children learn bad behavior from their parents, things like murder, rap or drug abuse; but I believe that children should learn from their parent’s mistakes. I agree with Jessica Wilde when she say’s “Morals are inherent from birth”(Wilde1). To me this is saying that kids, and even adults, should know the difference between right and wrong. Finally, put yourself in the mother’s position, if your son or daughter just died, how would you want their killer to be punished? How would you feel if you never got to see your child alive again while their killer served only a short sentence before being released from jail?

Now then, some people believe that we should stop putting teens in adult prison; they believe we should be lenient with them and give them easier sentences. These people argue that children are capable of learning from their mistakes and because they are children, they can be rehabilitated. Others say that teens are too young to understand the consequences of there actions, or that they don’t know their limitations with drugs or alcohol. I believe this is a ridiculous argument because teens shouldn’t be drinking or doing drugs in the first place. There are some people, like Hendricks, in his article “Stop Trying 13-Year-olds in Court as Adults”, who believe “They’re abused and come out more dangerous and damaged then when they went in”(Hendricks 2). This is a good argument; however, can’t we say the same thing for adults? Why should juveniles be treated any different than adults when the crimes they are committing are every bit as heinous as adult crimes?

Youths who commit crimes are criminals; they are walking our streets, living as our neighbors, and in many instances committing additional crimes. I strongly agree with Jessica Wilde when she says, “All crimes committed by juveniles should and must be treated in the same regard, it not to punish heinous acts, then to provide justice to the families of victims (Wilde 2). As a child myself, I was raised in a family who believes in punishments, spankings, and repercussions for the actions of the children. Some say morals are learned, others say we inherit morals at birth, either way, a criminal is a criminal and must be punished as such. Should we punish all juveniles as adults? Probably not with lesser crimes, but some crimes are certainly more heinous than others, and those crimes like murder and rape are adult crimes. It really doesn’t matter the age of the criminal, it they are committing crimes that are inherently adult in nature, then yes, these criminals absolutely should be punished as an adult regardless of their age. Our courts, our schools, nor our societies, should ever allow anyone, child or adult, get away with murder.


Similar Articles

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

This article has 172 comments.


Zhadum said...
on Apr. 14 2014 at 11:40 am
The author of this article has just stated blanket opinion without looking into the issue.  All I am hearing is if this happened to my relatives I would demand the maximum penalty…..   Blah Blah Blah Honestly a waste of time reading the article…. This is however the top google result so I am going to bother responding.   First we start with the US justice system and why Murder 1 gets a harsher sentence than Murder 2.  It is about how culpable the person is for the crime.  If an argument ends in a murder in the heat of the moment, the justice system considers that Murder 2 and the murderer is less culpable for that crime than a Murder 1 crime.  In the case of Murder 2 the person could have been antagonized to commit the crime by others or the victim.  In the case of Murder 1 the person has had time to plan and make a clear decision to kill the other individual, with time for emotional cool down. So what was the point of all that… Simple in order to be in line with the justice system we need to determine if a juvenile is as culpable as an adult.   So outside of mental illness what causes a person (Child or Adult) to commit an attack, like a school shooting or a work place shooting?  Well it all can be traced back to stress.  Stress come into your life from one of three basic sources: Home, School/Work, and Social Life.  When you get stressed it leads to: Frustration, Anxiety, Depression, and Anger.  Once you are stressed in one area your emotional response can cause you to upset the other areas of your life and generate stress from all three sources.  This if not dealt with, will lead to a negative feedback loop and a person eventually breaking down in some way that can include an attack on others.   So how does an adult manage stress differently than a child? An adult can self-medicate or remove that area of their life to reduce stress.  The 5 major stress self-medications are: Eat Food You Love, Buy Something You Love, Sex, Alcohol, Drug (Prescription or Non).  If said Adult is so stressed all self-medication has failed the adult can remove that area of their life.  Removing that area would include: Leaving Your Spouse, Quitting Your Job/School, and Moving Away From Your Social Life.  If all that fails or is not an option an adult is more likely to commit an attack. Now how many of those options to manage stress does a 15 year old have?  Most of them have NONE of those options.  Meaning the child is completely reliant on the adults in his/her life to help them manage stress.  The adults in that child’s life parents, teachers, or other authority figures bear a large amount of the responsibility if the child can’t handle the stress because the child does not have the personal liberties an adult has to deal with it themselves.  As a result of this I would say a child/juvenile is less culpable for this style of crime.   Now one could argue that between Murder 1 and Murder 2 the net result is the same.  You intended to kill someone and you did same punishment across the board.  Well that would require a rewrite of the entire justice system.  If you agree that Murder 1 and Murder 2 should be treated differently, then by extension you should also be agreeing that juveniles should receive lighter sentencing.  This is how the justice system was setup.  Public demand for juveniles to receive harsher sentencing should NOT be considered as a factor, but sadly it is.   I feel that I have given clear axiomatic arguments for why juveniles should receive reduced sentencing, predicated on the current justice system.  If you disagree I encourage you to give clear examples with facts not opinion as to why a juvenile should receive harsher sentencing.  Emotional arguments or trolling will be ignored.  Thank You for reading.

Law-wen said...
on Apr. 8 2014 at 5:43 pm
Kenny, I agree alot with what you're saying, but I have a question about somthing you said. You said "If the kid never does it again then thats great!" So what if "the kid" commited murder? How do we find out whether they'll do it again? Put them in rehab for 5 or ten years then let them out hoping maybe they won't shoot anyone? I am for circumstance. I beleive some kids should get another chance, but alot of the time these kids are too far gone. I think we need to judge the child based on his background his apparent or unapparent remorse and even on drug history

kadman said...
on Apr. 2 2014 at 2:08 am
To any of you that think kids should be tried as adults, you are absolute morons with no compassion or understanding of the mental development of children. We should be doing everything in our power to save, teach and nuture our children. A kid is a kid, NOT an adult, so it makes no sense at all to try them as such. AND I further have the gall to suggest that anyone thinking the opposite would not be open their private life being open to thorough inspection of society.

Rella said...
on Mar. 17 2014 at 3:16 pm
I like you, Kenny, just because of your first sentence.

Jdean1 said...
on Mar. 12 2014 at 1:03 am
Have you considered the fact that trying these teens as adults actually has inherent harms, not inherent benefits? In some cases such as murder, obviously we may want more serious measures, yet we do have to be careful with our developing minds.

Jesuslefttoe said...
on Mar. 5 2014 at 2:04 pm
wow you just saved me from failing engles 

-Steph- BRONZE said...
on Feb. 1 2014 at 5:36 pm
-Steph- BRONZE, Wrightstown, New Jersey
1 article 0 photos 2 comments
I completelly agree with you. When someone commits a crime as serious as murder or rape, the age should not even play a factor in the punishment. If someone commits a serious crime, their punishment should be just as serious and not toned down because they were a minor when they commited the crime. 

on Jan. 31 2014 at 2:31 pm
jennamarie3437 BRONZE, Columbus, New Jersey
1 article 0 photos 2 comments
It depends because, the kids may get off easy with their punnishment because, they're young...but a crime is a crime. 

vcsalexl said...
on Jan. 21 2014 at 2:59 pm
vcsalexl, Ventura, California
0 articles 0 photos 1 comment
great topic

jayelittle said...
on Jan. 17 2014 at 10:56 am
thats true

UnkownUser said...
on Dec. 11 2013 at 11:40 am
Kids should be tried as adults simple

mr. shelly said...
on Dec. 4 2013 at 10:25 am
I think I disagree with that kids are still developing and they don't know what they are thinking they should be givin another chance in life and make a change :)

puppy said...
on Dec. 3 2013 at 9:18 pm
great artical

aiman4 said...
on Nov. 16 2013 at 9:24 am
you sir deserve a coockie!

aiman4 said...
on Nov. 16 2013 at 9:21 am
how does an 18-10 year old differ their emotions from highschoolers?i mean they are still basically have the same thinking,you might will prove i'm wrong,but treating an 18-19 year old as an adult is no different than punish highschoolers

kenny said...
on Nov. 12 2013 at 11:16 am
first of all, if youre trying to make an argument then proper grammar will usually help get your point across. Second of all, if youre going to play the "put yourself in someone elses shoes" game then play it right. dont only put yourself in the shoes of the victim or the victims families, but also put yourself in the shoes of a young man or woman who commited such a crime. things arent always under minors controll. minds are still emotionally unstable in certain individuals and it isnt always prevventable. i dont think that they shouold be put to death for that. im 16 and i has complete control over my actions but many people arent able to do so. rehabilitaion should always be an option and if the kid never does it again the awesome! that means that it worked and you didnt even have to take his life. if he does however, then that would be the appropriate time to question severe reprocutions. but hey, thats just my 2 cents.

Ryuketsubara said...
on Nov. 11 2013 at 1:15 pm
I strongly agree with this statement. Juveniles should be tried as adults. They did the crime, now they should do the time.

zer0 said...
on Oct. 17 2013 at 12:52 am
Some kids need help more than they need punishment.

zer0 said...
on Oct. 17 2013 at 12:47 am
Interesting article.  Sometimes victims' families forgive the killer.  Paula Cooper was 16 when she was the youngest person sentenced to death in Indiana for killing Ruth Pelke.  However, Pelke's son knew that his mother was kind and forgiving and signed a petition to overturn Cooper's death sentence.  Cooper is now out of jail and is friends with Pelke's son.

HDP?????? said...
on Oct. 2 2013 at 11:42 am
it could be good to give a second chance but you have to remember that he or she felt so mature to commit the crime