Magazine, website & books written by teens since 1989

Call of Duty: World at War

By
Call of Duty usually makes a very good game but I don’t understand why they did not let activision make the new game. Call of Duty: world at war is one of the worst games I have ever played if not the worst. There is one thing on this game that I actually like and it is no reason to buy it.
There are many things that make it a bad game but the worst is the regestering system is horrible and they really don’t seem to be fixing it at all. It is really easy to get a kill but the number of times you get killed is very high also. And if you ever play on Xbox live the spawns will drive you up a wall. The only reason I play this game is because they added a game called zombies. This is the lone decent part of the game.
Call of Duty should just stick to letting activision make their game I bet they make a lot more money. It is never good when the older game is still better than the new one by a long shot. I would not recommend this game to anyone.



Join the Discussion

This article has 1 comment. Post your own now!

HeWhoDrawsandPlayGames said...
Jan. 1, 2013 at 1:44 pm
Actually, Activision is the publisher, and Treyarch was the developer of World at War. Although Infinity Ward is the original developer of Call of Duty, they and Treyarch rotate on Call of Duty games every year. In fact, the latest one, Black Ops II, was made by Treyarch. Also, you mispelled 'registering.' Did you really mean 'regenerating?'
 
Site Feedback