The Golden Compass 
For the most part, the actors are terrifically cast. Nicole Kidman, for instance, captures the essence of Mrs. Coulter in a very memorable performance with an elegant, gentle exterior, that slowly deteriorates as the movie progresses. At first she draws viewers in with her refined beauty. However, we soon see her evil side. Also, Dakota Blue Richards portrays the infamous Lyra Belacqua well, bringing alive her bravery, agility, and courage. She fits naturally into the role. At times, though, Lyra is obstinate and rude, which makes her less appealing. Finally, Freddie Highmore sweetly voices Pan’s character. His vocal performance is charming as he displays the innocence of all of Pan’s animal forms.
The film follows the plot of Philip Pullman’s novel, with slight modifications. Some scenes are omitted so it is not too long. Luckily these scenes don’t hugely impact the film.
The beginning of the movie seems rushed, with the first few minutes jam-packed with information from the book. This is confusing at first, and viewers may lose interest. The length is decent but if the movie had been just a bit longer, the characters could have been more developed. I felt that there wasn’t really enough time to establish the strong relationships between them.
Visually, the film is excellent. The directors and producers craft a beautiful and believable environment. The daemons are amazing; Pantalaimon, the golden monkey, and the other children’s daemons truly bring a magical quality. The Dust, too, is fantastic; it is depicted flowing out of those just murdered. Also, the armored bears are authentic and captivating. While the visual effects are fabulous, this movie may feel threatening to children. Animals and children are in constant peril. Additionally, there are many tense, violent scenes.
The ending is quite different from the novel. The book ends tragically, which is disregarded in the movie. Also the most exciting part of the book is not even in the movie.
Instead the movie ends on a positive note, with no one dying. There’s no excitement, no thrill, no final piece to sum up the plot. However, it seems set up for a sequel.
I really liked the movie, but you're right, nothing compared to the book. However, after the disappointment of Eragon, it seemed pretty good. Visually, it was amazing, and it stayed mostly true to the book. Nice review!!!
i love the review but i dont think the movie was that good at least not one of my favorits
Jun. 20 at 4:48 am:
I watched the movie and even though it was enjoyable I felt it paled in comparison to the books. The book was so complex and captivating while the movie was happy and optimistic.
This was another good book and movie combo. The movie stayed surprisingly close to the plot of the book.
I think your review is very true. The book does seem a bit better than the movie, especially at the end, which in the movie has no real closer.
Nov. 23, 2008 at 4:16 pm:
I agree mostly with your excellent-written review but one thing. Maybe it would have been nice if you talked about the star who played the protagonist?
Your best paragraph would be the 4th one. "The beginning of the movie seems rushed"











eddie S.
Join the Discussion
This article has 7 comments. Post your own!