Edit: autocorrect changed "obligations such as" to Pflugerville. Sorry.

Most anarchists are peaceful but irresponsible people. History has shown that when any part of society becomes completely unfettered, whether the government, corporations, or the people themselves, it takes away the rights of all the other parts. Many Americans want to drastically shrink the government without completely abolishing it but government shouldn't be too big or too small. Voluntary civil society is the best kind of social organization but living in civiluzation comes with certain involuntary Pflugerville paying taxes. I believe that in this country we have too much of the wrong kind of freedom, such as unfettered consumption and gun ownership, and not enough free thinking and open-mindedness. Anarchists equate a "natural" and "organic" social order with a positive one, and that's true when it comes to respecting the ecosystem, but by definition civilization exists to suppress the negative parts of our nature.

And the word 'gay' underwent the same sort of process as well. Goes to show what few destructive and noteworthy people/events can do to our language of today.

Anarchism is largely misrepresented in today's world. It is mainly a peaceful philosophy with the goal of stopping the corruption that the state inevitably develops when government officials forget that their job is to serve rather than to be served; in essence, anarchism is a comprehensive civil rights movement. Anarchists generally do not want chaos, just a more natural and voluntary form of order. It is because of the few, hypocritical anarchists who do protest through destructive crime, and the media who focuses only on this aspect of the movement, that the modern view of anarchism has the connotations that this work suggests.