Testing, Testing This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine.

January 22, 2009
More by this author
Albert Einstein once said, “Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.” Even he saw the obvious fallacies in testing.

The basic purpose of school is to equip us for success. That's what teachers, principals, governments, and oceans of bureaucracy exist to do. But success is measured in so much more than just scantron bubbles and fill-in-the-blank questions. A person's morals and character play a far greater part in personal achievement than knowing trivial facts.

Testing results in kids forgetting what they've learned. As contradictory as this sounds, I have firsthand experience of its truth. The only reason high school students learn is to ace the test. As soon as we step out of the classroom, we dump the information to create space. We then repeat the process. Even the honors kids do not retain much by the end of the year. And for the all-important finals, we reteach ourselves as much of the material as possible.

Furthermore, testing is not an efficient measure of intelligence. How well someone can memorize notes is not an indicator of smarts. Intelligence has more to do with comprehending material and the accompanying curiosity that results in students wanting to learn more. You cannot coerce someone into learning.

But the biggest injustice kids have to deal with is the biased, agenda-ridden concept of standardized testing. Some exams in my state are designed to grade the school. I believe that these do not further the learning process. Tests that are presented under the pretext of learning are actually used to brand a school and its kids as satisfactory or sub-par. These tests only have to do with funding, following the great fallacy of the No Child Left Behind Act. Schools must have adequate test scores in order to receive government funding, despite the fact that schools with lower scores are the ones that need the help most.

Consequently, schools with slashed funding turn to drastic measures of “teaching to the test” and cutting classes like creative writing, art, and even science – subjects that encourage the deeper thinking and reasoning so critical to personal development.

I hope that in the future, testing will become just another tool in the arsenal of teaching, not the savior of the educational system.

This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. This piece has been published in Teen Ink’s monthly print magazine.

Join the Discussion

This article has 23 comments. Post your own now!

Vijay said...
Nov. 3, 2009 at 4:15 pm
Good article but I would like to differ. Testing should remain an important tool to measure education. I agree it not fair to judge somebody based only on test score. But life is unfair. This is one of the first lession students should learn !!!
beth12345 replied...
Nov. 30, 2009 at 7:00 am
I think school test are overrated and sutid i fail all my test but my teachers think im stmart
Hawthorn replied...
Feb. 10, 2011 at 4:59 pm
tests are overrated. I had a Really weird testing experience once. When I was tested in 5th grade and they determined that I was "Gifted" then in 7th grade I was tested again and guess what? I wasn't gifted anymore. Then, a year later I was tested again and, how amazing, I was gifted again! Now how on earth am I supposed to fluctuate like that!? 
Pumpkinscout replied...
Sept. 18, 2011 at 6:21 am
Wow, that's pretty bad! Yes, tests are overrated, and what if before the 7th grade test, you'd just been up late coughing cause you had a cold and when you went there, you were tired and you're brain wasn't working too well. (just an example of a random event that could devastate your test scores) So they base the next two years of your education on that? Hmmm...
Site Feedback