Cambio Network
Magazine, website & books written by teens since 1989

Not All Zoos Are Inhumane This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine.

By
This piece is a response to “The Modern Zoo” from the May 2008 issue of Teen Ink. I volunteer at the Cleveland Metroparks Zoo and have gotten to know its keepers, veterinary staff, and other workers. According to the writer of “The Modern Zoo,” staff torture animals, do not provide adequate living space, and keep the animals merely to entertain. In my three years of volunteering, I have never seen, nor had any reason to suspect, any foul play at my zoo. The allegations in “The Modern Zoo” that all zoos are inhumane and cruel is false, I believe.

According to the article in Teen Ink, “Zoos claim to educate visitors. Yet we’ve all seen the one-sentence signs that describe monkeys. What can be learned from this? Certainly not enough to justify ­inhumane captivity.” One-sentence signs are not the end of zoos’ efforts to educate. At my zoo an entire department is devoted to educating the public about conservation of animals and our planet. If zoos didn’t care about education, why would they have this? While exhibits may display signs with brief information, staff work daily at the zoo to educate visitors about conservation and other critical topics.

Some zoo employees visit schools and businesses to educate the public about how to be more responsible with our environment. This department even organizes conservation projects around Ohio, such as the community effort to remove waste from Big Creek. Volunteers spent a day restoring the creek to a more healthy ecosystem. The zoo is also part of a ­national conservation campaign called Year of the Frog, dedicated to saving ­amphibian species from extinction. Zoos put forth tremendous effort to educate people, and to say that they do not is just not true in my experience.

“Zoo animals endure inadequate living conditions with no space,” claims the ­article. It’s not fair to make this generalization. My own zoo, for example, is planning a one-of-a-kind, spacious ­exhibit for its elephants. The exhibit ­encompasses many acres, and will be large enough to support a breeding population. If zoos didn’t care about adequate space for their animals, why would they waste time raising millions of dollars to build this type of exhibit? Also, my zoo cares a lot for its animals; it houses the second oldest hippo in North America and its polar bears are twice the age of those in the wild.

I witnessed a life-saving surgery on a 13-year-old wolf. Veterinarians worked for two hours to save his life. Thirteen is very old for a wolf. Zoos do care for their animals, and do what they can to keep them strong and healthy.

“These animals are simply meant to ­entertain,” claims “The Modern Zoo.” That too is false. At the Cleveland Metro­parks Zoo, animals are never forced to do anything for the sake of visitors’ entertainment. We believe in positive animal/ ­human interaction. Zoo staff never force or coerce an animal due to this policy.

The author of “The Modern Zoo” is ­obviously very passionate in his opinion about zoos. I am also very passionate. I have not written this to personally attack him. Rather, I am simply stating facts. “The Modern Zoo” paints zoos as cruel, inhumane facilities, but it is both unfair and untrue to claim this about all of them. Many have state-of-the-art veterinary ­facilities and work hard to save endangered species.

I hope that readers will see that zoos seek to protect and save endangered species, as well as educate and encourage the public to do the same.

This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. This piece has been published in Teen Ink’s monthly print magazine.




You might be interested in this content from TeenSpot:


Join the Discussion


This article has 61 comments. Post your own!

hedwigy13This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Dec. 5, 2011 at 5:20 pm:
I loved this peice mostly for its message. I know a lot of people who claim zoos are inhumane. But, in truth, those "mistreated" animals are a lot better off in captivity. If you want inhumane, go check out some puppy mills or talk to some poachers.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Nick5This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Nov. 23, 2011 at 2:50 pm:
Ok. Here is the problem with your writing, you list too much. You chose your topics and titles very well, but do away with listing. stacking your paragraphs so that you can't know one thing without the paragraph before it is key. also, work on different sentence lengths; I was close to yawning by the third paragraph.
 
TouchOfARoseThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Dec. 5, 2011 at 4:43 pm :
I noticed that too, but this is more of an expository/pursuasive and listing can be quite helptful and simplifies things for the reader to make them easier to digest. You yawning by the third paragraph suggests the problem is with your mental aptitude, not a problem with her writing.
I'm sorry...I really sounded like such a b**ch there...and it WAS b**chy, but stuff that that just bothers me. :/
 
Nick5This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Dec. 5, 2011 at 5:06 pm :
If it is expository/persuasive then stacked paragraphs even more important. Your job as an author is to knock me (the reader) out of my socks. Articles are not as long as fictional books, so you need to get to the point, and quick. Or else your reader may become bored. Does this clarify what I said earlier?
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
ThePeaceDaisyThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Oct. 18, 2011 at 3:28 pm:
I don't remember the author saying that ALL zoos are inhumane.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
WishfulDoerThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Jul. 4, 2011 at 2:31 am:
I agree with you on most accounts. The Oregon Zoo, I believe, is not merely for the entertainment. They recently transformed a concrete, minuscule Orangutan exhibit into a magnificent habitat. I was in awe. However, I don't think captivity is always a good thing.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Lilliterra said...
Apr. 7, 2011 at 9:58 pm:

Why is everyone saying that it is inhumane to keep animals in captivity? Look at it from the animal's point of veiw. Not yours. You are looking in through the fence/glass. You're thinking as if it was you. Well, animals don't think the same way as you.

To the animals it's just their home. It's not "captivity". They don't even know what "the wild" is. And I doubt they're missing much. They have everything they need: food, water, safety, shelter, space, a much better chance of being heal... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
buffydog15 said...
Apr. 7, 2011 at 6:43 pm:
I agree with SocialCollision!! They are inhumane.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
buffydog15 said...
Apr. 7, 2011 at 6:42 pm:
Those are some good points and its good that the zookeepers take such great care of the animals, but that doesn't justify taking animals out of their natural habitat to a zoo where they cant learn to fend for themselves and where the habitat created is full of nonnative plants and is unfamiliar. No doubt the animals are scared when being moved as you might be if you moved many miles away from your home.
 
EthnicMutt replied...
Jun. 12, 2011 at 12:05 pm :
The animals at the zoos are not necessarily taken from the wild and then put in zoos.  Many of them are born in the zoos or donated from those who buy exotic pets and then realize they don't want them.  Zoos don't just send expeditions to go hunt down new animals.  
 
TenwygThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Aug. 17, 2011 at 11:42 am :

Exactly, and often times, zoos are saving the animal's they take in, either because they are endangered, they may be no longer able to survive in the wild because of an injury or because when some idiot decides they no longer want an animal they never should have gotten in the first place and give it to the zoo. Zoo's are a safe haven for many animals and, if they are a well run facility, they are always trying to educate people on how they can help more animals by protecting habitats (or som... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
MetallixRose said...
Feb. 22, 2011 at 3:07 pm:
I totally agree with this aritcle. At the zoo by us, it's a really nice place.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Dart said...
Feb. 20, 2011 at 2:31 pm:

I completely agree with this article - thank you for writing it! I am also a zoo volunteer, and I can sympathize.


There are bad zoos. Cruel, inhumane ones. Usually, those are more along the lines of circuses.  I just don't understand how so many people can be blatantly anti-Zoo, when the people who do work at (good) zoos have spent so many years studying animals, know more about animals, and care more about animals than them. It's like saying an astronaut hates and knows not... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
BlackHoleHighAlumniThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. said...
Nov. 4, 2010 at 5:29 pm:

Plus have you ever seen animals in the zoo? most of them laze around or flirt with the tourists. They LOVE it! At Busch Gardens in Tampa, there is an Australian exhibit where the kangaroos and walabys are allowed to run wild and they love the attention they're given from the people.

And most animals in zoos (unless they're brought in due to injury) are bred in captivity, which means they don't know any different and it would be inhumane to release these animals into the wild because th... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
jessenielsen said...
Oct. 13, 2010 at 6:48 pm:
I was raised in Kenya (east Africa) and have seen my fair share of zoos. the only point of a zoo is to profit and provide entertainment. if you disagree with this, you may ask "how did those animals end up thousands of miles away from there natural habitat?" Africa has its parks and has many orfinages for the young animals that are unable to survive on there own in the wild. there is no reason rather then for entertainment purposes to have zoos. How ever you may take this comment, the facts ... (more »)
 
boston418 This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. replied...
Nov. 4, 2010 at 12:03 pm :
Yes, animals were originally removed from Kenya and other parts of Africa and placed in American zoos for entertainment.  That's pretty much indisputable.  However, that was years ago.  The animals in zoos today are not first-generation zoo-dwellers.  While the motives behind starting zoos may not have had the best interests of the animals in mind, it's not fair to assume this same intent for modern day zookeepers.  I think that times have changed for zoos.  They ar... (more »)
 
jessenielsen replied...
Nov. 4, 2010 at 8:35 pm :
i will have to disagree... a zoo is still a zoo, you are sugesting that second generation animals do not have the instincts of first generation animals. an animal has certain characteristics that dont change over such short periods of time. your reasoning is flawed my friend, a zoos condition may improve but does not change the fact that they are still in captivity. if a zoos only intention was to help the animals they wouldnt make it so commercial. you dont see hundreds of people spending there... (more »)
 
OliverKent replied...
Nov. 4, 2010 at 9:17 pm :
If I may interject, jessenielsen and boston418, you are both very correct with your opinions. Animals in the wild are in their true element but I believe properly treated animals in captivity are in that exact same element. It is all in the cicumstance; a normal, hard-working and sincerely caring zoo's animals will be completely content. An animal in the wild must create a rather large niche for itself with a place for clean water, a place for food, a safe place to rest and raise offspring ... (more »)
 
jessenielsen replied...
Nov. 7, 2010 at 9:30 am :
so what your saying is, we should ulter the course of nature? there are many places in africa that provide safety for animals that are getting killed off by hunters. zoos are not the salvation of poor indangered animals, its just a place for the public and there entertainment. not saying that the keepers dont care about their animals, just stating facts. there are enough protectd areas in africa were these animals can still be animals. when you cage, or fence in anything, how is that kind? how i... (more »)
 
Dart replied...
Feb. 20, 2011 at 2:24 pm :

Those are not facts.

Now, there are bad zoos. I'm not talking about those. Those are akin to circuses and should be eliminated. A good zoo's goal is to educate the public and breed animals. Grouping those in with bad zoos is insulting and disrespectful.

Many animals were born in captivity, many were injured in the wild and were rescued from certain death. Few animals are taken from the wild anymore, and they shouldn't be, unless they are hurt. That is something that should be st... (more »)

 
Lilliterra replied...
Apr. 7, 2011 at 9:41 pm :

Well hang on a sec. I agree with the beginning of your post (Dart's post), but... for one, what's wrong with teaching animals tricks? Who here teaches their dog tricks? What's the difference? As long as it's not something dangerous, or they don't be mean like cracking a whip or something.

I do agree with your other point. Zoos are very educational. If I had only seen giraffes in picture books or on TV, they wouldn't exactly seem real, would they?

Although I don't quite understan... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
jessenielsen said...
Oct. 13, 2010 at 6:48 pm:
I was raised in Kenya (east Africa) and have seen my fair share of zoos. the only point of a zoo is to profit and provide entertainment. if you disagree with this, you may ask "how did those animals end up thousands of miles away from there natural habitat?" Africa has its parks and has many orfinages for the young animals that are unable to survive on there own in the wild. there is no reason rather then for entertainment purposes to have zoos. How ever you may take this comment, the facts remain.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
tomtamtimmyThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. said...
Sept. 21, 2010 at 12:38 am:
i agree with hazydreamsbroken. most of the time its orphaned animals. or animals that seemed to be alone or in immedate danger.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Writer24 This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. said...
Sept. 3, 2010 at 1:46 pm:
This is a very well written and informative article. I wonder though, the person who wrote the first article, if they had stated that most zoos rather than all, if incase yours a rare kinder zoo. I don't know for myself at all, I'm just wondering if this other person's article, if they had been more careful not to use words such as "all" if they point would have held true.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
ImaginedangerousThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. said...
Jul. 17, 2010 at 2:57 pm:
I think a point that was missed in this article is that zoos are often used to help an endangered species breed, so the species can become stronger (the well-known pandas at the San Diego Zoo are a good example).  Other than leaving that out, the article was very well written. I enjoyed and agreed with it.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
SocialCollision said...
Jun. 25, 2010 at 1:34 pm:
okay. Here's what makes me mad. Lots of people say that NOT ALL ZOOS ARE INHUMANE. That's not true, It's inhumane to keep an animal against it's will. If an animal was born into the wild and taken into captivity, THAT is inhumane. Yes zoos have the means to take care of an animal, but to take the out of the wild to breed them? ABSURD! ALL ZOOS ARE INHUMANE.
 
grasslova replied...
Jul. 16, 2010 at 8:20 pm :
AGREED!! So then you'd agree with me when I say: it is positively cruel and cold-blooded for humans to keep plants cooped up in a plot of dirt, or so-called "garden" in countless backyards accross America! It's crazy man! These days, people are just so jacked up; so sick, SO twisted. It is unbelieveable. We should just go back to being cave men. (And women--to appease the femminists).
 
beautifulworld replied...
Jul. 17, 2010 at 7:59 pm :
I thnk you should read Life of Pi. It talks all about the subjects your bringing up and explains just how you can tell that most zoos actually DO care.
 
guineapig324 This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. replied...
Aug. 8, 2010 at 8:32 pm :
Life of Pi is a great book, especially if you like animals! And most zoo animals are bred in zoos, not taken out of the wild "against their will". Besides, animals do not think of this as a loss of freedom, but rather a means of easily obtained food, shelter, and protection! 
 
HazyDreamsBrokenThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Aug. 30, 2010 at 12:30 pm :
So you want to leave injured animals that can be saved in the zoo to die? I understand your views, but I also think you need to get off your closed minded track, and look at the GOOD zoos do for YOUNG ABANDONED animals, and INJURED animals that would never survive in the wild.
 
Zora. replied...
Aug. 30, 2010 at 12:53 pm :

grasslova, look up anarcho-primitivism, I think it might interest you. ;]

My opinion: Some people are cruel. Some of these people work at zoos. Some people care. They also work at zoos. Some zoos as a whole can be cruel, and some intend to be kind to the animals in their care.

I understand that, and so on physical level, zoos more often than not (as people are, more often that not kind as opposed to cruel) do not harm animals, and all levels, do not seek to harm animal... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
BlueberryPoptartHasAnAmazinglyLongScreennameThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Jun. 25, 2010 at 8:02 am:
But it's the whole concept for me. It just is disturbing to me that people feel they have such athority, and take animals into conditions that couldn't possibly replicate those in the wild. You bring up age as a measure of care. I disagree years liveed is equivelent to quality of life. Death isn't a bad thing. It's the natural end, and if you push and push and medicate and perform so many sugerys are you just cuasing animals unneeded pain and sufffering in the name of humans wanting to watch wol... (more »)
 
Steph0804 replied...
Aug. 17, 2011 at 9:46 am :
I agree with you. This idea that some of us humans have that we have total control over animals' lives is false. However, sometimes, if the animal is injured, orphaned, or dying, I think it's better to take them into our care (but I think it would only be fair to release them back to where they came from).
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Jane_P This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. said...
Jun. 3, 2010 at 7:59 pm:
Has anyone seen San Diego zoo? They have recreated the animal's natural habitats, and take such excellent care of them. Many of the animals are happier and healthier than they are in the wild.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
skywitch said...
Jun. 3, 2010 at 5:09 pm:

Not all zoos are bad, but some are, I guess that when you really look at it its party on how much money the zoo has.

I went to Disney World two years ago and was pleasantly surprised at how well the animals were treated. They had large enclosures (notice how I didn't say cages) and some of them were even able to interact with other animals.

I believe that people have come along way in how we treat their animals. In school I learned that the first elephant that came to America wa... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
JBfan4everThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. said...
Jun. 3, 2010 at 6:31 am:
This is a great review. You have really  strong evidence and you took the article and broke it into pieces and gave certain evidence to that thing exactly. This is great writing and an excellent review.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
AprilBlue said...
May 12, 2010 at 8:45 pm:

You totally pwned whoever it was that wrote that last artice. 

Cyberhighfive!

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
SassyJonesThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
May 12, 2010 at 6:28 pm:
great article. How do i apply to  get a job at a zoo? 
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
krazykathleenThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
May 12, 2010 at 4:52 pm:
I completely agree with this! Great counter argument and well written article!!
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
X_Dysfuntional_Lyrics_X said...
Apr. 20, 2010 at 9:53 am:
I love this article! You are right about the Cleveland Zoo. I love it and actually just filled out an application to work/volenteer there. I love our zoo and all the animals. I cant wait for the elephant exhibit to open up and for the elephants to come back. Our zoo does care about the animals. The signs we have at the Cleveland Zoo do not just have one line telling you about the animal. It shows a map of where the animal lives in the wild and gives a little paragraph about it. My one grandmothe... (more »)
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Gradschoolgrl said...
Mar. 7, 2010 at 12:10 pm:
You do a really nice job bringing in your own experience volunteering at a zoo so as to bring counter evidence to the article that appeared in the May 2008 issue of Teen Ink. I wonder if it might make your argument stronger if you acknowledged why some might hold this view. What should be done to eliminate inhumane zoos? How might that help humane zoos to flourish?
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Holly M. said...
Mar. 5, 2010 at 5:37 am:
Some zoo's are better than others. Let's face it. Some keep polar bears when they should be hunting in snow, some keep wolves even though they are pacing around their enclosure (completely bored!) and some should be shut down becasue the animals have such a bad life. But other zoo's are good. They treat their animals with love and consideration. They have bigger cages. They keep animals that could become extinct.
Zoo's are good and bad. The world has "good" ... (more »)
 
jakie replied...
Apr. 16, 2010 at 8:50 am :
first of all zoos are all bad. you say that some zoos have bigger cages but still there in cages its nothing like there real enviroment.
 
TenwygThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Aug. 17, 2011 at 12:04 pm :

I keep reading 'zoos are bad because they lock animals up'. Okay fine. But let me say something.

1) Most of the animals in zoos nowadays are in the zoo specifically for their protection. To save them from extinction, or if they are to injured to function properly in 'the wild'. The other animals are there because they were bred there. 

2) All you people who still insist that the only point of a zoo is to entertain people need to poen your eyes. And go to a zoo. The purpose ... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Bamm222 said...
Feb. 11, 2010 at 9:13 am:
i dont agree maybe some zoos treat there animals nicely but if you think the had to be inhuman to get there and moving them and just keeping them in there habitat in the zoo so they are ALL INHUMAN!!
 
LoveOfWords replied...
Mar. 7, 2010 at 7:10 am :
Living in a habitat that's not natural (by that I mean a zoo incloseure instead of the wild) doesn't mean that the animals are being treated inhumanely. So long as adequate space and the right kinds of conditions are provided, it's perfectly acceptable. Sometimes even better than in the wild. For example, sometimes dolphins will be hurt by boats or fishing nets or other animals. That doesn't happen in zoos, and they're an excellent tool for conservation.
Zoos can ... (more »)
 
AnneOnnimous replied...
Mar. 29, 2010 at 5:16 pm :
i have to agree with you there, loveofwords. As long as the animals are being treated well, zoos are an excellent concept; they teach the public about animals that most would probably never see otherwise. And it's not like animals in the wild are better off than animals in zoos; zoo animals are guaranteed to get food, whereas animals in the wild must fend for themselves and deal with nature, plus the damage humans are causing ot the earth. Even maltreated zoo animals are probably better off than... (more »)
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Stina said...
Dec. 31, 2009 at 5:34 am:
I agree with you that not all zoos are inhumane and many of the poeple that work for them are simply trying to help animals. I think its great that they save and take care of injured animals... but, animals are simply not meant to live in cages their whole life, have their food "hunted" for them and live a life that goes against their natural instincts. It makes me angry when I am in a pet store and the staff say how they "love" animals so much... if you loved animals, why w... (more »)
 
crawfordkid This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. replied...
Dec. 31, 2009 at 9:50 pm :
I don't mean to seem rude, and please forgive me if I do. But it would seem logical to believe that, considering the average memory span for a fish is three to five seconds, most tank-dwelling fish would not aspire to live elsewhere, and those that did would soon forget. Just a thought.
 
LoveOfWords replied...
Mar. 7, 2010 at 7:11 am :
Actually, fish have longer memory spans than that, but I agree with your general point.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment