Cambio Network
Magazine, website & books written by teens since 1989

Genetic Engineering Magazine

By
Bam! A 16-year-old takes off running at his high school track meet. He is not a quarter of the way around the track when the first of his five opponents reaches the finish line.

Now, in the 21st century, many people say the world is on the verge of a scientific revolution that brings one of the most ­controversial ideas of all time: genetic ­engineering of humans. I believe this is morally wrong, dangerous, and will lead to problems in our society.

The ethical dilemmas of human genetic engineering are what make this issue so controversial. Humans are trying to play too large a role in the universe. Many people believe that genetic engineering of humans is ­interfering with natural processes like the random selection of genes for looks and talent passed from parents to offspring. Human genetic engineering could let individuals “play God” and choose and manipulate their genes and those of their children. I believe that giving people this power goes against the basic forces of ­nature. All that is really needed is for us to accept ourselves the way we are.

The idea of a divided society in the near future is a troubling and likely consequence of human genetic engineering. Societies have always been divided by varying degrees of inequity and bias. Now, with the emergence of the genetic revolution, society entertains the prospect of a new and more serious form of segregation. One based on genotype.

The destructiveness of prejudice and discrimination is unmistakable. Imagine a world where the rich not only hold all the power, but they become superhuman. They could do things far beyond even the best abilities of normal people. Genetic engineering will bring about a rift between the upper-class citizens who are fortunate enough to afford such technology, and the lower classes who must rely only on their natural abilities. Human genetic enhancement would guarantee that families who can afford it would be able to perpetuate their social and political dominance.

Technology, or lack of enough advanced technology, is another topic of controversy for the genetic engineering of humans. It is interesting to think about the impact technology is having on the world, but is mankind ready for this kind of change?

Genetic engineering has the potential to treat and possibly cure a variety of cancers and chronic diseases, but in reality, this technology is not as promising and reliable as it may seem. Seven years after the first gene-therapy trial on humans, a complete cure for even one patient has not been produced. The technology seems to have an impressive array of benefits, but the science is still in its infancy.

It is simply part of the nature of mankind to want to be better, stronger, healthier, happier, and capable of achieving more. On the other hand, some things are better left unaltered. Change is not ­always good.

Magazine This piece has been published in Teen Ink’s monthly print magazine.




You might be interested in this content from TeenSpot:


Join the Discussion


This article has 109 comments. Post your own!

sally sunshine said...
Jan. 25 at 9:57 am:

im the best! around!!!!

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
ViridianVIP said...
Jan. 16 at 2:03 pm:

I disagree. I think it would be good to cure genetic diseases. And if the government opposed regulations, then the whole rich people thing would work out. Just imagine. People could be smarter, faster, better.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
DarkMountainVIP said...
Dec. 3, 2011 at 10:42 pm:

Genetic engineering could create a new system of segregation, and most likely would when first introduced- as you say, the rich would have it and the poor wouldn't. As technology becomes cheaper and becomes available to the masses, however, such as universal health care is in some countries (and should be in the US), this potential is removed- if everyone can have it, everyone will. Is it worth the initial conflict? And how long will that take? People fall on both sides. I enjoyed reading this v... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
MissyMayBelleVIP said...
Dec. 3, 2011 at 9:59 pm:

This really made me think. Thanks!!

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Clear_SkiesVIP said...
Dec. 3, 2011 at 7:46 pm:

And so the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. You're right. Us humans have enough predjudices already, so it's not the best idea to throw in genes as well. Nice job writing this! I totally agree!

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
GenyaVIP said...
Dec. 3, 2011 at 12:05 pm:

'm okay with genetic engineering if its for plants, and certaina animals (to produce more food for our growing population.)

But humans are a different story. This was in a movie once, Gattica, and in it people were discriminated against because of their genes. To have genetically altered humans, is like giving steroids to athletes. I'm with you on this one!

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
lzcelloplayerVIP said...
Sept. 24, 2011 at 6:36 pm:

This is an interesting debatable topic. Although I'm not which side I'm on, but this is also a very well written article. You did a great job on it, and this makes me think a little. Do we really want to advance our technology to change peoples genes? And is this morally right? 

Again, great job on it! :D

 
thought replied...
Oct. 20, 2011 at 2:13 am :

Could you imagine, in ten years or so, A person telling their best friend, or a man telling his wife, that they were geneticly altered at birth. Would you look at that person the same way if they told you.

It isn't fair, it isn't natural, it isn't right.

(by the way great article)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
PumpkinscoutVIP said...
Sept. 12, 2011 at 7:12 pm:

I don't think genetic engineering is right either

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
dave said...
Sept. 10, 2011 at 10:54 pm:

there are many challenges that we are certain to face in the future global warming, wars, cancer, sexually transmitted diseases, plauges, draughts. how can we possibly face these challenges with out bettering our selves. humans have remained unevolved for many centuries now. genetic engenering is like medical technology it is plentyfull in first world countries but minimal in second and third world regions but we still try to improve it. imagine people who have not seen the blue sky for all thei... (more »)

 
ControversyAtBest replied...
Jan. 16 at 11:40 am :

There is no such thing as perfect, you can only strive to make it better. But even if we could create everything exactly how we wanted, humans make mistakes. Whose to say that they wont mess up with this also?

 
someonewhoisme replied...
Jan. 16 at 9:21 pm :

Evolution isn't real

 
dave replied...
Jan. 16 at 11:18 pm :

I am a devoted chritian and I believe some aspects of evolution are real I will give you an example of what aspects are in my opinion imposible. giraffes are practically un evolutionised the are incapiable of evolution because because their body dimensions of it body and circulatiory system are flawless. in order to survive this magnificent creature needs to pump blood from the heart to the brain that is an amazing phenomina in any living creature but it is even more amazing and fascinating in s... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Mr.Grinch said...
Sept. 6, 2011 at 5:32 pm:

I agree completely. Us messing with the complex process it takes to simply BREATHE is like a beginner messing with a complex program. They try to "fix" something they think could be better, and end up making the whole thing a fail. And then there's the inevitable mistakes; what do we do with those? I'm personally rather scared something might happen as in House of the Scorpians; clones are made just to provide extra lungs and kidneys and hearts and such. That takes playing God to a huge level, a... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Babycakes56VIP said...
Jul. 2, 2011 at 7:11 pm:

Obviously genetic engineering shouldn't be used to make babies beautiful. It should only be used to make genetic diseases extinct. It should be used to allow a couple to have a kid, or even five kids, without living with the idea that they will pass on a gene that will, in no uncertain terms, eventually kill them. And no people have not been able to say, genetically engineer a person so they can save them yet. But even if the idea weren't being harshly debated, and there limits on what we can an... (more »)

 
someonewhoisme replied...
Jan. 16 at 9:34 pm :

The thing is people don't play by the rules. You say people shouldn't use it to make their babies beutiful, or be the fastest, or the smartest, or the most talented, ect. Eventuelly humans would screw it up big time like we always end up doing. Maybe it would start out like only curing diseases, but then people will eventually abuse it. Cars are a good invention, yes? Well, look at the people that claim there's global warming in the world. They begg for everyone to stop using cars and get bikes.... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
inspiredbytheworldVIP said...
Jun. 10, 2011 at 12:21 pm:

I am in complete agreement with this article. Recently, I debated this topic with some of my peers, and found that most people are pro-genetic engineering. I believe that the point of human genetic engineering would be to someday be able to go up to a scientist and say, "I would like this gender child with this color hair and this color eyes and have them be this tall at this age." But another point to argue on this topic would be the fact that, with genetic engineering, it could be possible to ... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
SummerRain101VIP said...
May 19, 2011 at 7:07 am:

I completely agree. This is something natural, and should not be disturbed. And especially the impact on society, as you said - it will be like a holocaust all over again, except this time, it will be based on reality and not someone's crazy ideals.

 
HejlnaVIP replied...
May 19, 2011 at 2:01 pm :

Same here. People should be happy with the body they have.

 
TheInnocentOneVIP replied...
Jun. 10, 2011 at 12:57 pm :

But even if the government decides its too dangerous and decide to ban it, people will continue to experiment. And of course there's that possibility of human cloning. Another bad thing where humans have decided to "play God". Both of these equally dangerous ideas are on the brink of becoming reality.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
BandGeekVIP said...
Apr. 6, 2011 at 10:42 am:

I agree with this, I did a project on gene therapy, and instead of curing people's illnesses, it gave two people cancer and never really cured anything. It often had side effects, especially if the gene ended up in the wrong tissue

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
imdefyinggravity said...
Apr. 5, 2011 at 3:33 pm:

 I don't understand what the first line has to do with the article... it seems out of place unless there was an explanation to go with it. 

 
Rauriice replied...
Apr. 5, 2011 at 6:48 pm :

I think the first line is proving that it has always been that it has always been people can catch up with you in a race. but if your genetically engineered then it changes everything..

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
jacobmhkim said...
Apr. 5, 2011 at 2:20 am:

Looking at the article the most broadly I can, I would have to disagree. First of all, the "immorality" of genetic engineering becomes completely irrelevent when we think of how cruel natural selection can be. It's a near fascist idea to say that only the fit should survive in this world. Genetic Engineering can be used in a variety of options from which you are stating but one: that it will be abused. It's true that the rich have much power in this world but if government regulations were put i... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
BayBee. said...
Mar. 14, 2011 at 5:31 pm:

Now what if genetically modifing foods has simalar adverse effects? I believe this is a more urgent issue, and it has been proven that the problems it has been creating will soon progress into disasterous proportions.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
scamp24VIP said...
Mar. 14, 2011 at 2:29 pm:

I agree! I think what your kis looks like at birth should be up to God. Genetic engineering gives the rich more power and arrogance.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
WerewolfWriting said...
Feb. 20, 2011 at 10:37 am:

I agree 100%  We should leave genetic engineering to books and authors and in the Science Fiction aisle in the library.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
MountainPoetVIP said...
Jan. 29, 2011 at 3:27 pm:

I agree, I agree, I agree. We were created the way we were for a reason. If we go messing with that reason, and try to create "perfect", we could cause extreme issues for humanity. If there was a reason for us to be "superhuman" to be genetically aligned in the perfect way possible, then we would have been in the first place. There are things in life that can use improvement, but I do not believe that humanity is one of them. And if you think about it, there things about us that ar... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
--forgiven--VIP said...
Jan. 29, 2011 at 3:25 pm:

yes, some can think this is wrong. some people may agree that this is morally and ethically incorrect. but honestly, if it's a way to improve our knowledge of things, why not? we don't need to genetically engineer everything, but if it can teach us more about the world of chances and oppurtunities surrounding us...why not test it out...?

if it won't hold as back, why not try to see if it will push us forward?

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Leann13 said...
Dec. 16, 2010 at 6:25 pm:

I agree. I mean, really, we were born the way were for a reason, right? Why would you want to tamper with the delicacy of each individuals' uniqueness?

 
Leann13 replied...
Dec. 16, 2010 at 6:27 pm :

P.S.- It's different if you want to save a child's life by making them unable to have deathly diseases. I'm fine with trying to save people's lives... just not selecting every feature of a child born.

 
DaddiesDoodleVIP replied...
Dec. 16, 2010 at 6:32 pm :

I completely agree! Nice work on this peice, you have tha some opinion as me!

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
missTaco said...
Nov. 2, 2010 at 4:11 pm:

i completly agree. nobody would wanna live in a world of identical people, think about it!

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
LexiB said...
Nov. 2, 2010 at 8:01 am:

I agree. I think the reason genetic engineering takes place is because parents want their kids to 'look better' or they want to choose their gender. How disgusting! I think this practice goes against the religion our country was founded on and it's just plain wrong! And the kids don't even get to choose if they want their cells messed with.

 
KatieD880 replied...
Nov. 29, 2010 at 3:11 pm :

You think that people go to genetic counselors because they want their kid to look a certain way? I never thought about it that way. I always thought genetic engineering was a good thing that stopped inherited disease from killing a child, such as cystic fibrosis does. I always thought that scientist should continue their research and one day find the cure to the genetic mutation of sickle cell anemia which affects 90,000 Americans according to the CDC. Or find cures to other inherited... (more »)

 
AnitaVIP replied...
Dec. 18, 2010 at 12:30 am :

yeah I agree. it's needed for genetic diseases, but not for appearance. 

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
sunshine14 said...
Oct. 11, 2010 at 9:05 pm:

Agreed. Completely. 100%. If this is our future, then what becomes of 'you are unique' I would feel disgusted with the thought growing up that my parents had me specially engineered. I'd feel as if I was processed and sold from a shelf. And giving my own children that image would make me even sicker still.

"It is simply part of the nature of mankind to want to be better, stronger, healthier, happier, and capable of achieving more." That, and the worst of all, to be better than everyone... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Johnny said...
Oct. 11, 2010 at 5:17 pm:

But it IS natural. All of you people who are against that don't realize that a form of genetic engineering happens in nature called NATURAL SELECTION. Animals pick and choose the strongest, healthiest mate that will most likely produce strong, healthy babies that will survive and pass on their good genes. Genetic engineering isn't much different.

 
towerjunkie019 replied...
Oct. 11, 2010 at 9:08 pm :

exactly.  genetic engineering is pretty much extremely fast evolution.

 
wordsoflifeVIP replied...
Feb. 20, 2011 at 6:44 am :

Are you serious? Have you ever seen a rat morph into a mouse? There is NO evidence of evolution. If natural selection does happen, all of those people with chronic diseases should be dead.

 
wordsoflifeVIP replied...
Feb. 20, 2011 at 6:46 am :

P.S.: Genetic engineering is morally wrong.

 
jacobmhkim replied...
Apr. 5, 2011 at 2:26 am :

@wordsoflife The theory of evolution states that species evolve over a long period of time. When you say that a rat cannot morph into a mouse, you are only talking about a single rat. However, a population of rats over time, with the right circumstances, can become new species. Also, morality is subjective.

 
MasterZone replied...
Apr. 5, 2011 at 11:30 pm :

I never thought of genetic engineering as morally wrong. Ever since I was in kindergarden, I dreamt of a world where everyone was genetically engineered to become extremely smart and/or extremely powerful in a physical aspect. Different people think of genetic engineering differently.

 
LilliterraVIP replied...
Aug. 15, 2011 at 6:19 pm :

Please read my article on evolution, and whether it is possible, called, "What Darwin Didn't Know."

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Albetta said...
Sept. 19, 2010 at 9:56 pm:

I completely disagree with this. Biological engineering is the future of the human race. Every other species to have died out has died out because they failed to adapt to a changing environment. Human beings are now on the verge of forcing our bodies to change. This tool can be used to make our race immortal, not individually, but as a whole.

 
sunshine14 replied...
Oct. 11, 2010 at 8:58 pm :

Yes, they did all die out because of changing environments, but what environment is there to change for us? Humans travel all around the world where a variety of environments await us. Environments do change, but one day a man can be staying overnight in Alaska, and the next, he'll be traveling through Egypt. Changing environment is not a threat to us.

I agree strongly with this article. I've most feared this topic of new technology. I agree on all levels with this piece.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Macx14 said...
Sept. 19, 2010 at 7:50 am:

I think the purest beauty of childbirth and bering children is having them surprise you. Watching them develop and grow naturally without being spoon-fed their physical and mental traits before they could do anything. It's not fair. You make a great argument and you're a strong writer. Check out some of my writing too if you have time!

 
sunshine14 replied...
Oct. 11, 2010 at 8:59 pm :

You couldn't have said it any better(:

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
tomtamtimmy said...
Sept. 19, 2010 at 3:26 am:

its scary to think what could go wrong in the genetic modification of a human. and it could be contiued down the familiy line.before we start playing god we must assess the risk and deplete them as much as possible. but though its scary to think what could go wrong it may also be a useful tool. someone with no legs could be put in a coma like state, have there genes changed and a few months later they wake up with a new pair of legs!

 
Johnny replied...
Oct. 11, 2010 at 5:08 pm :

That's not how it works. Genetic engineering is done through the passing of genes, mainly the good genes. Think of natural selection. That's what they're doing here. They can't go in and alter your genes now, not at all. That's not what genetic engineering is. Genetic engineering is taking the best and breeding it with another best, and then, bam. You have a better child. Then you repeat, until the best is even better than the former best.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment