Magazine, website & books written by teens since 1989

Critical Analysis of Sonnet 18

Custom User Avatar
More by this author
Sonnet 18

Sonnet 18 is among the most famous of Shakespeare’s works and is believed by many to be one of the greatest love poems of all time. Like other sonnets, it is written in iambic pentameter form, consisting of four quatrains and a rhyming couplet. It deals with the theme of beauty and the way it is affected by time. In this sonnet, Shakespeare also boasts to have the power to preserve his love’s beauty through poetry which has lead critics such as James Boyd-White to claim that it is actually ‘one long exercise in self-glorification’ rather than a love poem.

The sonnet begins with conveying the beauty of Shakespeare’s love. It is notable that their physical features are not actually described – we are told nothing specific of how they look – instead Shakespeare compares his love to a summer’s day and concludes that their beauty is greater than that of summer and the sun. The poem opens with the famous complimentary question:

“Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?”
This question is flattering in itself as a summer’s day is often associated with beauty. Shakespeare, however, explains that his love’s beauty exceeds that of the summer and does not have its tendency towards unpleasant extremes:

“Thou art more lovely and more temperate:”

Shakespeare makes specific criticisms of the summer: its beauty is spoiled by strong winds and it disappoints us by being too short:

“Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,
And summer’s lease hath all too short a date”
It should be noted that at the time the sonnet was written, England had not yet adopted the Gregorian calendar and May was considered a summer month. In the above quote, Shakespeare describes the fragility and short duration of summer’s beauty. The use of the word ‘lease’ reminds us of the fact that everything beautiful remains so for a limited time only and after a while its beauty will be forcibly taken away.

In the second quatrain, Shakespeare continues his criticisms of the summer. At this point, however, he focuses on the imperfection of the sun and explains that it is temporary and, like other aspects of the summer, tends towards unpleasant extremes:

“Sometime too hot the eye of heaven shines,
And often is his gold complexion dimmed,”
Shakespeare states that the sun, which he personifies and refers to as ‘the eye of heaven’, can be too hot or blocked from view by the clouds unlike his ‘more temperate’ love.

In the second quatrain Shakespeare poses his problem fairly explicitly: every beauty will fade either by chance or through the natural course of time:

“And every fair from fair sometime declines,
By chance or nature’s changing course untrimmed”
The repetition of the word ‘fair’ highlights the fact that this fate is inescapable for everything that possesses beauty. Shakespeare, however, states that his love will not lose their beauty to death or time but will be preserved through his poetry:

“But thy eternal summer shall not fade,
Nor lose possession of that fair thou ow’st,
Nor shall death brag thou wander’st in his shade
When in eternal lines to time thou grow’st”
Shakespeare’s self-assured claim makes it possible to argue that the purpose of the poem was not actually to pay a beloved person a compliment but rather to praise oneself for poetic skill. Evidence of Shakespeare writing this poem for the purpose of praising himself occurs subtly throughout the entire text. In the very first line, for example, due to the rhythmic structure the word ‘I’ is emphasised whereas the word ‘thee’ is not. This suggests that Shakespeare wanted to focus on himself rather than on his love. Likewise in the third quatrain, he personifies death and states that it will not ‘brag’ to power over Shakespeare’s love – this could be interpreted as Shakespeare stating that he will be the one who brags rather than death. Critics have also argued that since Shakespeare chose not to describe his love’s physical features, he was more concerned about praising himself rather than his love.

In conclusion, Shakespeare’s Sonnet 18 successfully conveys the themes of beauty and the effect of time on it through a variety of poetic techniques and effective use of the iambic pentameter structure. This sonnet, however, very possibly should not be regarded as a love poem due to the fact that Shakespeare has clearly aimed to draw a lot of attention to himself as the poet and that his description of his beloved’s beauty did not include much detail.

Join the Discussion

This article has 13 comments. Post your own now!

Ali_faleh said...
today at 11:38 am
yes it's very good and one of Shakespeare's most famous works .
Aimy el badawi said...
Mar. 21 at 9:01 pm
this sonnet is my favorite sonnet ever
Ali_faleh replied...
today at 11:41 am
it's very good comment but there is an other great sonnets written by Shakespeare .
Ali_faleh replied...
today at 11:42 am
sonnet sorry*
Welbeck said...
Mar. 21 at 2:54 pm
This is a great work considering your age. It is excellent and detailed. I'm glad you didn't keep it to yourself but share your incredible writing skill with the world -- it's become useful for my research. Thank you! Bravo!!!
SallySunshine said...
Dec. 29, 2014 at 2:41 am
Your analysis is well constructed but unfortunately has done little except transalate Shakespeare's love-lorn language into something that the common man can understand. Analysis of his feeling for his gay lover is ignored. Additionally you have failed to analyse the poem in it's own capacity as a love poem. Shakespeare has most likely strayed away from the usual descriptions for the following reasons - # Originality sake # His lover was a man, if he had wandered into explicit detail then his h... (more »)
YhalainenThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Dec. 30, 2014 at 6:34 pm
I do realise that this essay is quite heavily flawed and agree with what you have said. It ended up being what my English teacher called a 'guided tour' of the poem! I wrote it a number of years ago (aged about 13 or 14) originally intending it as part of my English folio, however, I ended up producing some better quality pieces of writing on modern poetry and submitting them instead. Thank you very much for your honest and detailed feedback. I've improved considerably since writing this analysi... (more »)
Donna replied...
Jan. 26 at 1:00 pm
I think that your analysis is excellent, and for your age, incredible. Keep up the good work!
awesome12 said...
Dec. 5, 2014 at 5:01 am
The poem is divided into 3 quatrains consisting of 4 lines each and a rhyming couplet
LittleRedRidingHood said...
Mar. 23, 2013 at 9:17 am
Well done! You've analysed it really well, and have used a very advanced vocabulary. :0)
YhalainenThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Mar. 23, 2013 at 7:02 pm
Thanks for your positive and constructive feedback on both of my articles.
Mrdq replied...
Jan. 14, 2014 at 9:27 pm
 thank you  for your  analysis  Yhalainen! It was very useful for my research. :) But I would like to ask the year you  have written this article  for my citation reason. please! thank u :)
YhalainenThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Dec. 30, 2014 at 6:36 pm
I apologise for the delay in replying to your comment. Thank you for your encouraging comment! The article was written in 2011.
Site Feedback