Get Our
Print Magazine

48 pages of creative bliss. Written by teens for teens since 1989.
Subscribe!
See us on Facebook,
MySpace & Twitter
   

Home > Hot Topics > Environment > Meat: An Environment Killer

Meat: An Environment Killer This piece has been published in Teen Ink's monthly print magazine.

Rate this article:
By Vidushi S., Secaucus, NJ
We’ve all seen our share of scientists in white coats, explaining what global warming is, why it’s dangerous, and what we can do to stop it. We encounter protests against fossil fuels and auto emissions. But the one industry that produces more greenhouse gases than all the SUVs, cars, ships, planes, and trucks in the world combined, according to GoVeg.com, has carefully avoided this scrutiny. The meat industry is an often-overlooked factor in environmental destruction, existing unnoticed as a
Photo credit: Ciara L., Sutton, QC, Canada
major source of deforestation, wasted natural resources, and pollution.

Rainforests hold a wealth of plant and animal life. Trees are natural air filters, pulling harmful carbon dioxide from the air and converting it to oxygen. The meat industry, particularly cattle ranching, kills millions of acres of rainforest each year.

Just one quarter-pound hamburger requires the clearing of six yards of rainforest and the destruction of 165 pounds of living matter, including 20 to 30 plant species, 100 insect species, and dozens of birds, mammals, and reptiles, according to ChooseVeg.com. Small amounts of beef in an individual’s diet soon add up and do great harm to the environment.

Cattle farming turns fertile land into barren desert, threatening or eliminating more plant species in the U.S. than any other cause. Livestock grazing can be a huge threat to endangered species and may contribute to extinctions.

There is no doubt that the meat industry causes immense, irreversible harm to the earth’s rainforests. But this is not the only victim of the meat industry. Meat consumption also produces a massive amount of waste.

Four hundred and forty-one gallons of water is required for each pound of cattle raised, compared to just 14 gallons to grow a pound of grain, according to ChooseVeg.com. Three days of a typical non-vegetarian diet requires as much water as the average person uses showering for an entire year. An individual can save more than 3,700 gallons of water per day by eating a plant-based diet. Ogallala, the largest aquifer in America, is depleted by 12 trillion gallons a year, mostly due to soaring meat production. Besides draining our water supply, meat production leads to food shortages as well.

World hunger is a severe problem, with millions of men, women, and children going hungry each day. Most people do not realize that not eating meat could relieve starvation worldwide. Meat production takes up 70 percent of the world’s agricultural land. A single acre of farmland can, over a year, produce 250 pounds of beef or 40,000 potatoes. Yet it is not only land usage that prevents food from getting to the people who need it most. Twenty percent of the world’s population (1.4 billion people) could be fed with the grain and soy beans currently consumed by U.S. cattle alone. By adopting a vegetarian diet, individuals could cut the amount of land used to produce their food by a magnitude of ten.

Another unpleasant side effect of meat production is the pollution it produces. Animal agriculture creates five tons of waste per person over a typical lifetime in the U.S., according to ChooseVeg.com. That’s 87,000 pounds of waste each second. Animal waste from factory farms seeps into groundwater, contaminating it. Chicken, hog, and cattle manure has polluted 35,000 miles of rivers in 22 states and contaminated water in 17 states. The EPA reports that pollution from livestock farming is a leading cause of water contamination in the U.S., killing marine life and making drinking water unsafe.

Meat production is also a major cause of global carbon dioxide and methane pollution. These greenhouse gases trap heat in the atmosphere, contributing to global warming. Colossal amounts of fossil fuel are used to grow food for livestock, dispose of remains, and transport the meat. Cows are a major cause of methane pollution because their waste contains large amounts of the gas. In America, cattle have altered the environment more than all the highways, strip mines, dams, and power plants combined, according to ChooseVeg.com.

Producing a single pound of meat emits the same amount of greenhouse gases as driving an SUV 40 miles – 500 pounds of carbon dioxide for just a quarter-pound hamburger. Worldwide petroleum reserves would be exhausted in 11 years if the rest of the world started eating meat like the United States does. But if Americans skipped one meal of chicken per week and substituted a vegetarian meal instead, the carbon dioxide savings would be equivalent to taking more than half a million cars off U.S. roads (ChooseVeg.com)! Despite these undeniable statistics, some people ­defend eating meat and deny the impacts of an ­omnivorous diet on the environment.

There is no doubt that meat production harms the environment by contributing to deforestation, global warming, wasted resources, and pollution. The United Nations has said that going vegetarian is the greenest thing individuals can do to save the environment. The University of Chicago reports that going vegetarian is 50 percent more effective than switching to a hybrid car in reducing greenhouse emissions.

What did the great thinkers Aristotle, Albert Einstein, Charles Darwin, Mohandas Gandhi, and John Lennon have in common? They were all vegetarians. But don’t worry, there is no need to swear off meat all at once! By simply reducing your meat consumption (especially beef) you can take steps to help save the environment and stop global warming. Cut down a little bit each week at a pace that suits you. Refrain from eating that hamburger – our earth will thank you for it!
This piece has been published in Teen Ink's monthly print magazine.This piece has also been published in Teen Ink's monthly print magazine.

Join the Discussion


This article has 40 comments. Post your own!

neonchandelier said...
Mar. 7 at 8:33 am:

I'm an off again, on again vegetarian, and what actually made me quit was the vast amount of blowing things up peta was doing on their web site, they had no credibility. I just want straight facts; and you've provided some very important ones here. Thank-you.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
xAllegria said...
Feb. 26 at 7:46 am:

The most water we consumed is wasted on food, and probably most on meat. The statistics here are frightenning... good article.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
i<3steven! said...
Feb. 25 at 3:25 pm:

i recently turned vegetarian because of a pita video i saw on yutube, i think that you make a good point and i was wondering how many people who are vegetarians eat poultry or fish?

 
guinea_pig_girl replied...
Mar. 4 at 5:41 pm :

Well, there are many opinions on this, but mine is that if you eat poultry and fish, you aren't a vegetarian. They are animals, too, right? However, it is better to eat only fish and poultry than all meat, of course. :)

 
i<3steven! replied...
Mar. 5 at 3:39 pm :

yep yep yep!!

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Beatman said...
Feb. 18 at 11:25 am:

I've been a vegetarian for many years, but I respect people who eat meat. It's their choice after all, and we can't say that the whole world should be vegetarian. It's too much of a personal choice.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
DalekJast said...
Feb. 18 at 7:54 am:

Why are cows necessary for survival? Somehow lactose intolerant people and vegans survive without milk or meat. And the population of cattle would go down because of natural predators in the wild that ate some of them.
Vegetarian for life!

 
AnneOnnimous replied...
Feb. 25 at 7:17 pm :

vegans may survive, but they're not as healthy. Humans were built to be omnivores; we disrupt the balance of life by not doing so.

 
maggermufin replied...
Feb. 26 at 7:58 am :

Actually, that's not true. Vegetarians are much more healthy than omnivores because they get closer the the proper servings of everything. That means, not too much and not too little. We get the proper servings of vegetables, fruit, grain, fats and oils, dairy, and protein. For the last two, many of us take supplements to help but we're still a lot healthier. This is because in modern society, too much meat is consumed and it has become the focus of any dinner...even though it's a... (more »)

 
AnneOnnimous replied...
Feb. 26 at 4:20 pm :

I never said that I like the modern way of making food; everything is processed, or else expensive. I agree with you on the technology ruining everything. And i suppose it is true that we have already disrupted the balance of nature; but is it right to make something worse just because it is already bad enough? I think it would be better if humans could go back to how we used to live, like aboriginal people, and eat what we ate then.
and, as for those studies you mentioned, that is just bi... (more »)

 
maggermufin replied...
Feb. 27 at 8:32 am :

I never said that technology is ruining everything. You're using it right now. It's helps us learn what's in our foods so we can make wiser choices. It has allowed us to see that killing animals isnt necessary because we can get the same stuff from plants. By going vegetarian you're helping to correct the balance of life by taking out of the food chain the one species that is dominating the planet. As humans we are already destroying natural habitats, draining land for farmin... (more »)

 
AnneOnnimous replied...
Feb. 27 at 4:45 pm :

but again, you are wrong. Just because I am using technology (a fact which i am perfectly aware of) does not mean that is a good thing. And just because it has allowed animals to not be killed (which it hasn't really; you overlook that they are killed all the time by other animals, hence the all important circle of life that is overlooked by many vegetarians), that does not mean that is a good thing either. It disrupts the balance of life; so no, you are laughably wrong, vegetarianism does... (more »)

 
maggermufin replied...
Feb. 27 at 5:50 pm :

Wow. I'm not going to argue with you anymore because I really doubt you're over like 13-14 max. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. You're logic is flawed. You haven't even considered poplulation growth over centuries, the fact that technology did allow for people to realize that animals don't need to die to provide people with healthy living. And if you are so into living like an aboriginal....why don't you go do that. Get rid of all you mode... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Bricheze said...
Jan. 28 at 7:06 pm:

As an agriculturalist and environmentalist I can tell you that while livestock production does release a large amount of green house gases, use a fair amount of resources, and otherwise pollute a large amount; it's also something we need.
Crop land is not the same as pasture land. Pasture land is not sustainable enough to produce crops, only to raise livestock. We don't have enough sustainable crop land to support a world of vegeterians.
So while, yes, we do need to find a... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
pfgoldfish13 said...
Jan. 23 at 5:39 pm:

I just wanted to say that according to the law of conservation of matter, matter cannot be created or destroyed. Your essay was proving a good number of points, though.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
dancer123 said...
Jan. 20 at 2:04 pm:

Valid points.. but you need to come from both sides.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
babe892 said...
Jan. 13 at 9:09 pm:

What a great piece. So many people do not know about the many harmful ways of the way our meat is produced today. And so well-written!
-Proud Vegetarian of 4 Years

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Stina said...
Jan. 13 at 9:53 am:

Great article! I agree with everything you have said, though I think most humans do need to eat at least some meat. Though nowadays I think most people eat FAR too much meat, and the way the raise many animals in farms is terrible. I was a vegetarian for some years but now I eat meat again though I try and only eat organic meat and mostly eat seafood. I think it would be good for you to also talk about other options. Because for example I know some people with the blood type "O" who ne... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
AmnyR said...
Jan. 13 at 7:46 am:

well written article. two things though... 1) try having at least one more source
2) disscuss the other side of the argument so that readers know why the whole world hasnt given up meat already! other than that, your article was very impressive!

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
sillyaardvarkabc said...
Jan. 6 at 4:23 pm:

I'm a vegetarian and this is basically the reason why. I have only convinced 3 people to do it with me though. My whole family only eats meat twice a week and we haven't eaten red meat in a couple years. I'm doing all I can to help, but I don't think just a few people supporting vegetarianism will change the world. I do think, however, that we should try.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Miranda J. said...
Dec. 13, 2009 at 8:32 pm:

I really like how your article includes citations, but I think more source variety would give it more creditability. Still, this proves it is more than just your opinion talking. Also I would like to point out that it would take a significant decrease in the consumption of meat to even change the supply a little. A few people who decrease the amount of meat they eat will not change the production of meat at all. I do realize, however, this is why people try to get the word out there, like this ... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
tayamazing said...
Dec. 6, 2009 at 6:29 pm:

Ok here's the thing. The article said that yes, cattle produce methane gas, but if we all turned to vegetarians, the population of cattle would increase severly, also causing MORE methane!!

 
Mary G. replied...
Dec. 20, 2009 at 5:18 pm :

No...the population of cattle would go down, because most are raised specifically for the purpose of eating. If there was less demand for beef, they would bring the supply down accordingly. This isn't like humans are going into the wild and keeping down the populations of herds -- these are human-created populations, and humans can adjust the number.

 
Hello!! replied...
Jan. 20 at 11:49 am :

Does this mean giving up cows we have to give up milk?!?!? Cows are necessary to survival!!

 
BillyBob replied...
Jan. 20 at 2:02 pm :

Cows are necessary for survival!!! And if we stopped eating them they would keep producing more cows. Unless we had all you vegetarians castrate them all. But then they would become endangered.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Sunshine said...
Dec. 5, 2009 at 11:01 am:

This article really changed my mind and I am going to try eating less meat.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
ninster900 said...
Dec. 3, 2009 at 9:10 pm:

i know its true, i hope that by being a vegetarian i ve done something to help

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
SouthLakeFootball75 said...
Nov. 29, 2009 at 9:04 am:

I think that even though this article did shed some light on the whole vegitarian thing, i think that you aso have to look at the flip side of the arguement. By eating more plants, we are eating the natural oxygen giving lifeforms in our ecosystem, and by eating meat, we are taking away more sources of carbon dioxide.

 
DalekJast replied...
Mar. 9 at 8:08 am :

The only reason that there are so many livestock animals that produce carbon dioxide is because people eat them. If we reduced the consumption of meat drastically, in theory, the supply would go down, lowering the amount of carbon dioxide produced by livestock. If the demand increases, however, carbon dioxide levels produced by livestock go up because there are more animals being farmed.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
karly2413 said...
Nov. 28, 2009 at 6:22 pm:

I think your piece was totally wik(wiked). I've learned alot from it. I believe that I will be trying to cut down on my meat eating. I see that eating more meat is very problematic in ways to a very high extent. I'm impressed by your article.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Vidushi S. said...
Nov. 28, 2009 at 5:09 pm:

I'm glad the article told you things you might not have known before! I always tell my friends that my goal is not to convert everyone to vegetarianism but to make them realize the impacts of their actions--and hopefully cut down on their meat consumption just a little bit afterwards.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
TalktalkKC said...
Nov. 28, 2009 at 10:36 am:

Excellent article, I went vegetarian a year ago last wednesday because of the animal lover in me, but now, you've reinforced my stance. Thanks a lot, there was a lot in that piece that I didn't know, but I'm glad I do now.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
shoshone17 said...
Nov. 27, 2009 at 8:41 pm:

Good point! You got me convinced.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
veggieme said...
Nov. 26, 2009 at 10:53 pm:

i think more people should go vegetarian so that we can save our planet !

 
An admirer replied...
Nov. 29, 2009 at 11:59 pm :

I like the girl in photo.
Why does all "Go Veggie" ads come with HOT girls ?
any clue?

 
veggieme replied...
Nov. 30, 2009 at 5:59 pm :

for your info. im a female and that was my first post to any of these articles okay!

 
veggieme replied...
Nov. 30, 2009 at 6:00 pm :

nope i have no idea

 
dancer123 replied...
Jan. 20 at 1:57 pm :

I think this makes a very valid point but I also thing cutting off meat completely is a bad idea.. what about cows for milk we still need to raise them? They'll over populate us if we don't eat them and take the vegetation. So what about that!

 
veggieme replied...
Jan. 20 at 10:26 pm :

thats a really good point i dont know about that

 
guinea_pig_girl replied...
Mar. 4 at 5:48 pm :

To dancer123, cows will not overpopulate us- the ones we use for meat are specifically raised for that purpose. And humans don't really need milk- I'm not saying it's bad, but we're drinking milk that was meant for calves. We are only "supposed" to drink milk as infants.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment