Magazine, website & books written by teens since 1989

Call of Duty: World at War

By
“Call of Duty: World at War”, which recently came out for multiple systems is a pretty good looking game. The single-player campaign is quite exhilarating yet, the co-op campaign is even more fun. The co-op campaign is more exciting because of the fact that you can either play the regular campaign with three other people or you can choose to play Nazi Zombies with four people (including yourself.) Most people, including myself, got this game because of the incredible multiplayer that Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare had. At first I thought it was amazing until I learned that if you die you have a high chance of spawning behind the enemy or in front of a firing gun. The developers have taken no steps into fixing the problems with the game. Most recently I found that a lot of people like to go under the map and shoot you from under your feet. For a final wrap up I am saying that this game is awesome except that the flaws make it a lot less fun. Having Treyarch for the developer of the game was a very bad idea because Activision did a much better job on the last game.



Join the Discussion


This article has 1 comment. Post your own!

Capt Trev6 said...
Feb. 23, 2009 at 8:31 pm:
Very very true about how activision should have made it because Trearch had so many glitches. cool artical man
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Site Feedback