Cambio Network
Magazine, website & books written by teens since 1989

Capital Punishment Is Dead Wrong This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine.

By
Murder is wrong. Since childhood we have been taught this indisputable truth. Ask yourself, then, what is capital punishment? In its simplest form, capital punishment is defined as one person taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is the definition of murder. There are 36 states with the death penalty, and they must change. These states need to abolish it on the grounds that it carries a dangerous risk of punishing the innocent, is unethical and barbaric, and is an ineffective deterrent of crime versus the alternative of life in prison without parole.

Capital punishment is the most ­irreparable crime governments perpetrate without consequence, and it must be abolished. “We’re only ­human, we all make mistakes,” is a commonly used phrase, but it is tried and true. Humans, as a species, are famous for their mistakes. However, in the case of the death penalty, error becomes too dangerous a risk. The innocent lives that have been taken with the approval of our own government should be enough to abolish capital punishment.

According to Amnesty International, “The death penalty legitimizes an irreversible act of violence by the state and will inevitably claim innocent victims.” If there is any chance that error is possible (which ­there always is), the drastic measure of capital ­punishment should not be taken. Also, it is too final, meaning it does not allow opportunity for th accused to be proven innocent, a violation of the Fifth Amendment which guarantees due process of law.

District Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan ­argued against the death penalty: “In brief, the Court found that the best available evidence indicates that, on the one hand, innocent people are sentenced to death with materially greater frequency than was previously supposed and that, on the other hand, convincing proof of their innocence ­often does not emerge until long after their convictions. It is therefore fully foreseeable that in enforcing the death penalty a meaningful number of innocent people will be executed who otherwise would eventually be able to prove their innocence.”

As humans, we are an inevitable force of error. However, when a life is at stake, error is not an option. The death penalty is murder by the government. As a nation, we have prided ourselves in our government, its justice and truth. However, can we continue to call our government fair if we do not hold it to the same rules we do its people? Murder by a citizen will have consequences, yet a government-approved ­murder is not only acceptable, but enforceable. What message do we send the American people, and other countries, for that matter, if we continue to be a ­nation that kills its citizens, a nation that enforces the most barbaric form of punishment?

The Illinois Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty states, “We don’t cut off the hands of thieves to ­protect property; we do not stone adulterers to stop adultery. We consider that barbaric. Yet we continue to take life as a means of protecting life.” No person, government-affiliated or not, has the right to decide if another human is worthy or unworthy of life. Our natural rights as humans, which cannot be taken away by the government, include the right to life. Humans are not cold metal coins that lose value; no act, no matter how heinous, can make a person less of a human being. However, for most it is easy to ­forget that each of the 1,099 executed since 1977 are fellow humans, not just numbers.

According to Amnesty International, “The death penalty violates the right to life.” Capital punishment contradicts our moral beliefs and claims of a fair and just government. The U.S. must join its political ­allies – including Europe, Scandinavia, Russia, South Africa, and most of Latin America – that have abolished the death penalty.

The death penalty is favored by some as an effective deterrent of crime; however, it is proven that states with the death penalty actually have higher murder rates than those without. It is proven that our nation does not need this extreme threat of punishment to prevent crime. In 2006, the FBI Uniform Crime Report revealed that the area of the U.S. that was responsible for the most executions (the South with 80 percent) also had the highest murder rate, whereas the Northern areas that had the fewest ­executions (less than one percent), had the lowest murder rates.

It can be said that the death penalty is the most overlooked form of government hypocrisy; we murder people who murder people to show that murder is wrong. It is this contradiction in policy that confuses criminals and undermines any crime deterrence capital punishment was intended to have.

Many people favor the death penalty as reparation for the wrong done to a victim’s family; however, in most cases, closure is not the result. Losing a loved one, no matter how that person is lost, is unbearable, irrevocable, and shattering. Pain like this is shocking and the victim’s family holds onto the hope that the execution of the murderer will bring relief and closure. Nevertheless, when execution day arrives, the pain is not eased. No relief can be gained, for their pain is an unavoidable, natural process of life. Victims’ families have founded such groups as the Murder Victims Families for Reconciliation and The Journey of Hope, which oppose the death penalty. They ­believe that they are different from those who have taken their loved ones and they demonstrate their ­difference by refusing to sink to a murderer’s level.

Capital punishment is immoral and a violation of natural rights. It is wrong for everyone involved: the prosecuted innocent, criminals, victims’ families, and our nation. We need to replace the death penalty and capital punishment with life without parole, a safer and more inexpensive option. The death penalty does not guarantee safety for innocent victims, it does not follow the goals and promises of our nation, it does not effectively deter crime, and it does not give closure to victims’ families. Nothing good comes of hate, and nothing good can ever come from capital punishment. It cannot continue to be accepted by a nation that claims to have liberty and justice for all. The death penalty is murder on the sly and it’s dead wrong.

This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. This piece has been published in Teen Ink’s monthly print magazine.




You might be interested in this content from TeenSpot:


Join the Discussion


This article has 380 comments. Post your own!

LivingforGodsince2003,This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Feb. 13 at 2:18 pm:
I agree. I got in a big debate with my guy friend over this today. He said it should be used more.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
BuddyJiles said...
Feb. 2 at 9:50 pm:
Since when did the Bible control the USA ?
 
NighttimeVesperThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Feb. 27 at 6:08 pm :
This country was built upon the law and principles of the God and the Bible. Haven't you ever taken a glance at The Declaration of Independence? 
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
RedDaisyThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Jan. 28 at 2:38 am:
A local TV show in my country stated that Death Penalty should be brought in to fight crime. But they do not analyze why there is so much crime. Social problems, economy, no jobs...these things make a man/woman turn to the things they should not turn to for help, such as drugs and stealing. And yet what will Death Penalty do? Justice for the rich. The law will sway to one extreme of the scale: greed, money, and power. An innocent, hard working man will not have money to pay for a lawyer; a per... (more »)
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
savetheplanetThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Jan. 25 at 6:59 pm:
I completely agree, the death penalty is a horrible form of punishment that stops nothing and only endangers the innocent. It even costs more than just locking them up!
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
ControversyAtBest said...
Jan. 16 at 11:50 am:
I agree completely with you. As the article said, innocents do get wrongly charged, and then what happens when you find the real criminal. "Woops, we murdered the wrong guy?" And another thing you hit in the article, if we are killing killers to show that killing is wrong, shouldn't at least half the government be subjected to this themselves? Especially when it comes to the fact that they just murdered somone who could possibly innocent.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Rogersright said...
Jan. 15 at 8:19 pm:
i 100% agree with this . If you really want to punish people for awful crimes give them an awful punishment. Death to me just seems to be the easy way out. i would much rather the person spend the rest of there days locked in a jail house then being murdered easily .
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
purpleyobes said...
Jan. 13 at 7:12 am:
I agree and disagree with this article . If someone kills a person it all depends on who they killed and why. If they killed someone for self defence they dont deserved to get punised. If someone kill the president they deserve the death penalty.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
bergKnayR said...
Jan. 11 at 7:30 am:
I completlyagree with ThunderBOLT12. There is no justice in murder. If a mand chooses to kill, he should be punished severely
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Kiersten H. said...
Jan. 11 at 7:28 am:
Im very sorry but i strongly disagree with you. Some people diserve the death penalty and i have npo problem with that. I belive if someone killed someone else, for their punishment they should be killed. What they diserve is what they should get!
 
ThunderBOLT12This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Jan. 24 at 6:56 pm :
In a perfect world, there would be no need for a death penalty because no one would kill. But this isn't a perfect world, and Unfortunately there needs to be a death penalty. P.S. Kiersten, ROGATE rules!
 
thelogicofloveThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Feb. 28 at 2:08 pm :
An eye for an eye will make the world blind.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
K-Berg13 said...
Jan. 11 at 7:20 am:
What I don't get is if some one takes a life I don't get why the convict can get away with no charges or just 3 years. To take an innocent man's life is terrible. Those criminals should think before they acts and maybe we wouldn't need capital punishment.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
ThunderBOLT12This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Jan. 11 at 7:17 am:
Although you have Noble intentions, the death peanilty is nessesary. For one, there is not enough prision room tho hold all of prisoners who are on death row. And there is the tride and true saying "an eye for an eye."
 
Raven-Mcdonald replied...
Jan. 15 at 8:39 am :
I completely disagree, while an eye for an eye is a "Tried and true statement" No one should revert to revenge as a form of justice. And as for the lack of space for death row inmates, This is still no reason to kill people. no one should have to die because there isn't room for them!
 
ThunderBOLT12This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Jan. 24 at 6:38 pm :
They are not dying because there isn’t enough room. Yet. However, if we kept every criminal who killed someone, most likely more than once, we would have to build new prisons because the old ones would fill up. And I am a Christian. The bible states multiple times eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth, ECT. And before you say not everyone is Christian, it goes the same for the Jewish and Muslim people! If they have chosen to kill, to take a sacred thing, they should be punished accordingly... (more »)
 
ThunderBOLT12This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Jan. 24 at 6:42 pm :
Oh, yeah. Don't disrespect the bible by basically saying that it old and now inaccurate. It primarily teaches peace!
 
BuddyJiles replied...
Feb. 2 at 9:48 pm :
First off the Bible does teach peace, but with many contradictions and flaws. And you say that there is not enough room in prison, I know the reason. Marijuana and other drugs usage being a crime. Also, if you as a Christian claim to love and accept all people then why would you support there death? But revenge is not the answer let karma pan out and give them a second chance. How about you think about your true beliefs and values before claiming yourself a Christian.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
scottyman said...
Jan. 5 at 12:13 pm:
you my dear are an idiotic fool and you cant evan began to understand the death penalty. my younger cousin of 23 years was shot in the head by a piece of criminal trash when he witnessed the man rob a gas station and now you are so bold to go online and post your foolish moronic adolesent thoughts online and say capital punishment is wrong? as the bible says "whoso sheddeth a mans blood, by man shall his blood be shed"
 
Raven-Mcdonald replied...
Jan. 15 at 8:49 am :
Idiotic fool is a term more suitable for you my fellow writer. Although I understand what it is like to lose someone in something as undeniably diabolical as a crime, it is still not right to kill someone as a form of justice. And you must remember that the Bible was written in a time when it was right to hang someone for being different, when it was OK to cut someones hand off for stealing bread to feed their family. Scottyman, who are you to say that the writer can't understand the death penal... (more »)
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
anna_bananaThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Dec. 4, 2011 at 4:34 pm:
This should have been a comment to the comment below me :D the article's grammar was fine..... lol
 
anna_bananaThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Dec. 4, 2011 at 4:34 pm :
ignore this... its soooo difficult to reply & im getting confused.
 
miss'pretty replied...
Dec. 9, 2011 at 8:46 am :
Sorry to say but this story does'nt make any sence to me at all.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
SeasonalFogThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Dec. 4, 2011 at 1:15 pm:

You didn't address that prisons are overcrowded leading to more violence, a waste of innocent taxpayer's money, and that more people forced into a cell than the capacity allows.

Remember- Supreme court ruled that 3 people to a 2 person cell is "cruel ad unsual punishment" whereas the Death Penalty was not ruled cruel.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
chandler said...
Nov. 15, 2011 at 2:12 pm:
death is wrong both by normal people and wrong by government
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
baNANnanThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Nov. 11, 2011 at 5:34 pm:
I think you should correct your spelling.
 
AspiringauhorThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Dec. 3, 2011 at 6:36 pm :
I think you should comment on the content of the article, not on the mechanics.
 
anna_bananaThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Dec. 4, 2011 at 4:36 pm :
The comment belonged as a reply to the comment below me, I mistakenly posted it as a new comment, not a reply..... 
 
AspiringauhorThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Dec. 4, 2011 at 4:45 pm :
My apologies. Pay me no mind.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Bones96This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Nov. 10, 2011 at 5:21 pm:
I agree somewhat. For murder I think that it should stand such as first degree and serial killing. I am not agesnt or agreeing with the death penlety.But if some has taken the life of more than on victum for the fun that is wrong and I would not just want that person to be in jail I would want that person dead. So for serial killing and murder first agree it should stand other crimes we should find other ways of punishing that person who did the crime. 
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
subliminal96This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. said...
Oct. 19, 2011 at 7:57 pm:
I completely agree with you. An eye for an eye makes the world go blind
 
Raven-Mcdonald replied...
Jan. 15 at 8:52 am :
I agree completely
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
packers22 said...
Oct. 5, 2011 at 10:20 pm:

Capital Punishment is only the tip of the iceberg

 

Should capital punishment be completely abolished? Possibly.  But unfortunately there are much deeper problems with the judicial system. Take, for instance, the Casey Anthony Trial.  Regardless of her innocence, was it not absurd to have court on national television?  Some may call this increasing public awareness, which sounds very romantic.  Yet is it really?  Nationally televising a  trial... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
dis kid said...
Sept. 30, 2011 at 1:03 pm:

i think if some one kils a nother or raps a kid they should be killed.

 

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
lzcelloplayerThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Sept. 28, 2011 at 3:30 pm:

I very much agree with your opinion that capital punishment is wrong. I think that we should find a different way of punishing those who have committed murder. If we drop down to their level, then who will we be? Just because it is the government doesn't mean that they have the right to murder people themselves. 

I say we abolish capital punishment! 

Great work by the way! :D

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Redwriter said...
Sept. 16, 2011 at 9:57 am:

The goverment has been given a sword for a reason.

Not to say that you haven't given some good arguments, you have, and this is a very well written article. But, the fact is, capital punishment does deter some crime.

It definitely doesn't deter all of it. But there is a small percentage that will be intimidated by the fact that there will be justice. You say that it's a proven fact that countries with death penalty have higher murder ra... (more »)

 
swcricket98This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Dec. 11, 2011 at 6:33 pm :
I love this comment and agree completely.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
HeartBreaker2010This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Sept. 13, 2011 at 10:42 am:
if the person who killed a loved one it doesn't really help the loved one, it just means they wanted the person who killed the loved one to feel the pain, but think again that's someone else's loved one too, its just doesn't make since. but this is so true. GOOD WORK!!!
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
bombthrowerThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Sept. 10, 2011 at 9:50 pm:
c.astrate rapistis instead.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
PumpkinscoutThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Sept. 6, 2011 at 7:52 pm:
Wow. Before I read this article, I thought the death penalty was wrong, but I wasn't sure exactly where I stood on that. Now I am 100% convinced: It's wrong. You're right that it doesn't help the victim's family: their loved one is still gone! It doesn't bring them back to kill the guy that did it. They need love and forgiveness and a second chance. Sure, they should be punished, but killing is irreperable. And what about the innocent souls who are, essentially, murdered, for no reason at all? T... (more »)
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
spiritirisThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Sept. 5, 2011 at 5:08 pm:

Like that quote:

"Why do we kill people who kill people to show them that killing people is wrong?"

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
AsIAmThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. said...
Sept. 5, 2011 at 1:03 pm:
I totally disagree with you.  An eye for an eye.  If it is certain that the person was the killer (as in pleaded guilty, caught on camera, dirty ******* sure), then I think they should be killed, and I'm not going to lie - I think it should be in the painfully-evil electric chair.
 
shapeshifter56This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Sept. 27, 2011 at 12:09 am :
I  have to disagree. "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." And two rights don't make a wrong.
 
shapeshifter56This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Sept. 27, 2011 at 12:10 am :
I meant to say two wrongs don't make a right. Sorry about that.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
KafyraThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. This work has been published in the Teen Ink monthly print magazine. said...
Aug. 14, 2011 at 9:52 pm:
THANK YOU! I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks that there's something strange going on with killing people for killing people.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
yousaypotato...This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Jul. 27, 2011 at 7:27 am:
TOTALLY agree with you, i think. I'm not actually sure bcuz i didnt read the whole thing...but captial punushment is murder. And we can't murder muerderers, because then we will become murderers ourselves. God and only God should have the power to take a life. And everyone deserves to live, no matter what they do.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
just.always.lexi said...
Jul. 23, 2011 at 1:51 am:

 

I agree, why not just let those who are kept in prison and deserve to be formally and informally rot in a 6' by 11' jail cell anyways? A being higher than themselves will surley punish them, maybe not in this life, but in a higher place anyways. To waste the rest of your years away in solititude...that is a hell on Earth, most definitely.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
BorderlineGenius777This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Jul. 1, 2011 at 12:28 pm:
I respect your opinion, but in my eyes, capital punishment is needed. some people are to dangerous to be left alive in this world. Take Charles Manson for example. he was an evil cult leader that persuaded his followers to murder several people, including a pregnant woman! and he is still alive because the "geniuses" in California gov't decided it was wrong to kill people for their crimes. I understand that sometimes it gets mixed up and innocents die, but there are just some people to dangerous... (more »)
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
WishfulDoerThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Jul. 1, 2011 at 9:50 am:
I pretty much agree with you. Our government uses death to settle its affairs, and that is wrong in so many sad, sad ways. As far as I'm concerned, even if you kill one rapist, there will be more, and if you kill one serial killer, there will be another. We can't exterminate our species for the good of our species; it just doesn't work.
 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
swcricket98This teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. said...
Jun. 27, 2011 at 1:25 am:

I believe that capital punishment should be used in extreme cases. For example, if a person goes insane and kills his wife, he should go to prison without parole, and should lead a terrible life. But if someone like the woman in the recent trial about the mother who drowned her helpless child in a swimming pool, deserves to live, than I don't know who does. And I understand what I am saying is picking and choosing which cases should be capitally punished and which shouldn't, but that's what t... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment