Facebook Activity



Teen Ink on Twitter

Teen Ink Forums

Lively discussions with other teens
   
Osvaldo_CThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. posted this thread...
Jul. 7, 2012 at 7:31 am

htt  p://documentaryheaven.c  om/loose-change-911-an-american-coup/#disqus_thread

 

I'm not being disrespectful against anyone affected by 9/11. I'm just saying that the government covers up a lot and the documentry proves that 9/11 could be one of them.

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
human6 replied...
Jul. 7, 2012 at 10:43 am

The US government couldn't of done that, it isn't capable, those guys got torn up by pop mech

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
Osvaldo_CThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Jul. 7, 2012 at 2:07 pm

Are you so sure about that. If you saw the hour and a half worth of proof, it would show how the evidence would conclude how 9/11 could be caused by the government. 

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
DynamoThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Jul. 7, 2012 at 5:03 pm

how can the highest intelligence agencies ignore a militant attack that is threatning to destroy them.  

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
Osvaldo_CThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Jul. 7, 2012 at 6:52 pm

Aren't those agencies in control of the government? ISn't this a government action. Yes to both.

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
human6 replied...
Jul. 7, 2012 at 8:13 pm

The problem with that theory is that the government doesn't follow that style, its justifications are Golf of Tonkin incident types stuff, bad stuff happens and then they over blow it. The didn't need to blow up a building, they could have just said Saddam had nukes and invaded. 9/11 is linked to Saudi's and Iranians, if it was an inside job why wasn't it linked to Afganistan and Iraq?

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
Osvaldo_CThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Jul. 8, 2012 at 4:24 pm

It IS linked to Iraq and Afganistan. The governments says how terrorists caused 9/11. Then the government says how they are in Iraq and Afganistan. So now the country goes on a "stop terrorizm" journey and goes over there. But they are really there for two things: money and oil. They go there and take the oil that's available there. And since they invade both countries, that'll cause trouble and war usually helps the government get more money. 

 

If only there were something simliliar to the Pentagon Papers for each president. Then the public would know easily.

close [  

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
human6 replied...
Jul. 8, 2012 at 4:51 pm

no, actually its linked to Bin Ladin, a minor Saudi noble, and some Turkish extremists. I can source this, but don't have time because my brothers being a dick

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
Imaginedangerous replied...
Jul. 22, 2012 at 7:57 pm

Except Afghanistan has no oil, and neither war made any money. War is incredibly expensive and starting one for economic reasons (when we're already one of the strongest economies in the world) is insane.

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
DynamoThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Jul. 23, 2012 at 2:38 am

Dude, you gotta be kidding. Afghanistan is teeming with natural resources. And its neighbors too.

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
Imaginedangerous replied...
Jul. 23, 2012 at 8:10 pm

I know there's natural resources in general, I just didn't think there was any oil specifically. Or am I mistaken? You're the Pakistani, so you'd probably know better than I would.

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
JCMerak replied...
Jul. 23, 2012 at 8:58 pm

Oh, no . . . You're not one of those Truther's are you!?

 

Just kidding! I've watched way more than that documentary. Good going Osvaldo. Screw Popular Mechanics and the "official 9/11 Commission". You'd have to be nuts (yes, sorry, I have a bias human6), to believe the official story. There are way too many open holes in it and way too many instances when the government has either staged or committed false flag terror events. To sum it up: Building 7! Why did NORAD stand down during the entire event even though they knew that they had real bogey's and could have scrambled to bring those planes down before they hit the buildings; surely they knew it was apart from the war games they were performing that day that resembled flying planes into the same buildings!?

 

Also, and I know it's fresh, but there is a growing speculation on the eve of the week for a UN Small Arms Treaty being signed, that a massacre was committed in Aurora, Colorado, only 13 miles from Columbine and in a city with strict gun laws that prohibits citizens of protecting themselves and others. A little fishy, but its still open ended, but also too coincidental.

 

Take a look at government sponsored terror: The Reichstag fire, Operation Himmler, the Gleiwitz incident, Operation Gladio, the Lavon affair, Operation Ajax, MKUltra, Gulf of Tonkin, USS Liberty, Operation Northwoods, Army Field Manual FM 3-05.301, Army Field Manual FM 3-39.40 . . . Just a few, but the list goes on. They may not all be actual events where government carried out the attacks, but were either used to their advantage to start conflicts or create a pretext for provocation. The government is more than capable of carrying out any operation they so choose.

 

More later?

-J.C.M.

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
DynamoThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Jul. 23, 2012 at 11:16 pm

Petroleum deposits are present in Afghanistan, as well as coal resources.moreover Afghanistan is a house of poppy cultivation=making h.eroin And while the war in Afghanistan might have been an attempt to capture theses jewels, all know that there is oil in Iraq(largest reserves according to geological survey report). So this probably had more far-reaching benefits than just warding off terrorists.

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
DynamoThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Jul. 23, 2012 at 11:16 pm

Petroleum deposits are present in Afghanistan, as well as coal resources.moreover Afghanistan is a house of poppy cultivation=making h.eroin And while the war in Afghanistan might have been an attempt to capture theses jewels, all know that there is oil in Iraq(largest reserves according to geological survey report). So this probably had more far-reaching benefits than just warding off terrorists.

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
Osvaldo_CThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Jul. 24, 2012 at 3:10 pm

To J.C.M. - I like you're style there and I fully agree.  :D

 

To Dynamo - The government just uses those 'terrorism' and the he.roin making just to get their hands on those resoucres. Also, you refer to it as 'war in Afghanistan'. In my opinion, it's more like 'the invasion in Afghanistan'. Our forces invaded them. How can they call that a war? 

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
DynamoThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Jul. 25, 2012 at 8:51 am

Agreed, Osvaldo.C. Its more like an invasion than anything else. And there's more to it than meets the eye.

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
human6 replied...
Aug. 16, 2012 at 2:43 pm

Afganistan is useful to the ruling class because it lets them control oil flow, and lets them contain Iran and India, which is looking to go red soon

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
Osvaldo_CThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Aug. 16, 2012 at 6:45 pm

It's all about the black gold. In our society, whoever has the oil has the power. And the U.S.A thinks that they can do whatever they want and take it from wherever they want.
 
I've heard that the U.S.A might go after Iran next. If they do, that could start WW3.

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
DynamoThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Aug. 19, 2012 at 11:57 am

Osvaldo:
I agree with you heart and soul. Really, we are literally 3 days away from WW3

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread
DynamoThis teenager is a 'regular' and has contributed a lot of work, comments and/or forum posts, and has received many votes and high ratings over a long period of time. replied...
Sept. 15, 2012 at 2:29 am

RIP, the 2,976 innocent people who died on 9/11
And the 49,644 innocent Afghans and 1,690,903 innocent Iraqis who paid and still paying for it !

Reply to this Thread Post a new Thread

Launch Teen Ink Chat
Site Feedback